baker on 8513

the piece was explained 3x , once on op, second on a post to your update which walked over it and third towards the end of the bread.

your response when it was explained for the third time.

>>665786 pb

>did not have time to read it…

This is your job, worry about what it says rather than who says it. Your excuse of needing it to be nominated is quite the apologist attitude as you had plenty of time to read other content and place it in notables without it being nominated.

>if it was important

it was and you are either the most financially illiterate person on the face of this earth or……

carry on.