> Elizabeth II was crowned on 2 June, 1953
66 years ago, how witch-y is that?
KEK
Look here:
ETS already knew that on May, 30
https://twitter.com/TrueEyeTheSpy/status/1134332981466816512
But this can't be…because larp…
Ty, for posting this, Anon.
>What do you think?
I think that your thoughts are interesting.
And that China is far more important than Comey.
China is still a potential threat to the US.
Comey may be corrupt, but not a threat at all anymore.
>It was covered up in public media by saying those killed were a couple nameless arabs.
And how do we KNOW that a Rothschild died instead?
>ScotAnon apologises for such the jaundiced, one sided view presented
I hear you, ScotAnon.
The MSM is one GLOBAL network.
Same here in Germany.
Best wishes!
No, but normally I don't see Rothschilds anyway.
Have you seen Lynn lately?
If not, it wouldn't be proof that she's dead, or would it?
> I really believe China is the C. Iran situation is calming down
China seems to be the banker "elite's" new pet, the new central for their NWO project.
And re: Iran, maybe Iran is also, like China, a project of the so called elites/ the bankers.
Q told us that China is way more important than we might think.
Trump tells us the same, day in and day out.
China and treasonous politicians are the tools the "elites" use to weaken and destabilise countries to get them to submit to their One World Government.
Excellent post, Anon.
Lynn was an e-x-a-m-p-l-e!
Try to keep up.
You have no proof that a Roth died that day.
Green died that day.
They tried to extract a Roth, but failed.
Unfortunately.
>We have no idea who died.
True.
Q only told us that we should remember Green, who died that day.
Fully agree!
Internet Bill of Rights
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:47 PM
Anonymous
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:05 PM
>>548144
Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?
>>548157
Q post 841:
Re read drops.
https://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
Q
This tweet is about ATT/ Internet Bill of Rights!
Let's make one of our posts a notable, because I think Potus' tweet and the connection ATT/ Internet Bill of Rights is important.
Good thinking!
>Nothing to do w/ AT&T.
Read Q post #841
"
Internet Bill of Rights
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:47 PM
Anonymous
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:05 PM
>>548144
Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?
>>548157
Re read drops.
https://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
Q"
It says:
"ABOUT ATT.COM
and INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS"
Potus says that CNN is acting like a monopoly, only leftist vies and agenda reported.
Yesterday we talked about announcement re: google being a trust and that this will be investigated.
Now Potus mentions CNN and asks what ATT could do.
And in Q post #841 we read this:
"
Internet Bill of Rights
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:47 PM
Anonymous
4 Mar 2018 - 5:19:05 PM
>>548144
Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?
>>548157
Re read drops.
https://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
Q"
Q posted a link to an article about ATT.com and that consumers need an Internet Bill of Rights.
"Should we roll out the red carpet for Donald Trump?"
"Yes, we should roll out the red carpet for the President of the United States, the deepest red and the finest thread."
Jacob Rees-Mogg finds the warmest words for Potus