tyb
have you seen them or a current picture since?
It's not lynn, try to keep up anon
>Lynn was an e-x-a-m-p-l-e!
that was your statement and not clarified. See when you make generalized statements you will get a generalized answers in return.
The other anon already made moar of a detailed explanation to you.
try to read and use your brian.
and really 12 posts already?
had to get a few hours in, like 3. normally get about 5. missed one bread. Like you choice on #1 ;)
for sure anon. good rest for you
Huawei trade secrets lawsuit opens in Texas amid spying allegations
(Reuters) - Huawei Technologies, the Chinese telecommunications equipment supplier fighting a U.S. sales ban, kicks off a trade secrets lawsuit in the United States on Monday against a former employee who has sought to turn the case into a referendum on Huawei’s corporate behavior.
The trial, involving salacious allegations of corporate espionage, racketeering and a secret database of rivals’ technology, promises to keep Huawei in the spotlight amid a U.S. blacklisting and pressure on allies not to buy its networking gear over security concerns.
Jury selection begins on Monday in a federal court in Sherman, Texas, with the trial expected to last about three weeks. The judge in the case, Amos Mazzant, is also separately hearing Huawei’s bid to overturn the Trump administration’s ban on its sales to government agencies and contractors.
Huawei’s lawsuit against former employee Ronnie Huang and his startup, CNEX Labs Inc, claims an “an illegal pattern of racketeering” by the ex-manager to steal its technology and poach its staff, according to court documents. CNEX develops chips that speed up data storage on cloud computing networks.
Huang denies wrongdoing and has filed a countersuit, alleging Huawei is using U.S. courts to acquire his and others’ technology and quash rivals.
Huawei seeks “many tens of millions of dollars” in damages and rights to about 30 trade secrets and CNEX patents, according to a spokesman for the Chinese tech firm. Among Huawei’s claims, it says another Huawei employee downloaded some of its secrets before he joined CNEX.
“Huawei proved a springboard for (Huang) to succeed where he otherwise could not have,” the spokesman said. The case had nothing to do with tensions over the U.S. blacklist, he said. “This is not a U.S. versus China case,” said the spokesman.
Huang started CNEX in 2013 and has raised more than $100 million from backers including arms of Dell Technologies and Microsoft.
A Huawei official posed as a potential buyer and the company used ties to a Chinese university to gain access to CNEX designs, Huang’s countersuit claims. Among its accusations: Huawei rewarded staff for stealing rivals’ trade secrets and stores the pilfered technology in a secret database for its use.
“(Huawei) is a vast competitive-intelligence gathering operation, gathering the intellectual property and trade secrets of the world’s top technology companies,” Matthew Goss, CNEX general counsel, said in an interview.
Goss said Huawei’s lawsuit, which includes one of the first claims to be heard under the U.S. Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, was “weaponizing our courts against U.S. companies.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-usa-cnex-trial/huawei-trade-secrets-lawsuit-opens-in-texas-amid-spying-allegations-idUSKCN1T40GA
on both….
no shit…plot thickens
would need that to do it. cut the strings for good ty for bringing that forward.
there are many permutations involved and bottom line is you can't fix or address one without the others since they all work in concert with each other to maintain control. IBOR/LIBOR a big part of it…BIG
controls the swaps via the big banks and the 'assigning' of the LIBOR rates. That process is nothing moar than a survey, nothing empirical about it.
he's fucked up enough shit already doesn't need another 'notch on that guitar'.
This explains the LIBOR process.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/12/how-is-libor-determined.asp
Morning Market Report
With all this news the futures are only down marginally-in the past it has taken just one of these types of headlines to have a triple digit dump in Pre-Market activity.
Panic-stricken traders now expect Fed to cut rates twice in 2019, this chart shows
Traders don’t expect the Federal Reserve’s patient policy to last for much longer.
A number of Wall Street forecasters said on Friday they expected more than one rate cut by the end of this year. JP Morgan said they expected two rate cuts, worth 25 basis points each, before the end of the year. Their forecast was topped by Barclays which anticipated a 75 basis point reduction in 2019 via a half-point cut in September and a further quarter-point cut by year-end.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/panic-stricken-bond-traders-now-expect-two-rate-cuts-in-2019-this-chart-shows-2019-05-31?siteid=rss&rss=1
pepe been sayin' this for a few weeks now-it is now fully reflected in the CME Fed watch futures chart-See cap#3.
this has also changed since last night, now it shows a roughly 6% chance of a deeper cut starting in September-this was not on the chart last night-this is the proof of the above headline.
JPMorgan Slashes U.S. Yield Forecasts on Trade-War Shock.
https://www.bloomberg.com//news/articles/2019-06-02/jpmorgan-cuts-u-s-10-year-yield-target-to-1-75-from-2-45?srnd=markets-vp
Google Shares Slump 3% After Tech Giant's Weekend From Hell
Between the DoJ firing, POTUS declaring war on the Silicon Valley tech giant, and the cloud outages that plagued much of the US and Europe Sunday afternoon, Google parent Alphabet had an extremely rough weekend.
And as expected, markets are now pricing this in, as Google shares slump 3% in pre-market trading on Monday.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-03/google-shares-slump-3-after-tech-giants-weekend-hell
Global Mkts drop As Traders Brace For Recession Amid Global Trade War
Global stocks continued to slide and investors sought the safety of government bonds, the yen, the Swiss franc and gold on the first trading day of June as rising trade tensions sparked fears of an upcoming recession (which according to Morgan Stanley will hit in 3 quarters or less-and sending oil sliding close to bear market territory.
this is good for us-not so for OPEC.
Also over the weekend, China’s Defence Minister Wei Fenghe warned the United States not to meddle in security disputes over Taiwan and the South China Sea, after acting U.S. Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan said Washington would no longer “tiptoe” around Chinese behaviour in Asia.
There was not flight to safety for Deutsche Bank, whose stock dropped to a new all time low, sliding below €6.00 for the first time ever after JPMorgan said DB's issue is not about capital or liquidity but about poor operating profitability and it needs to stop "tinkering with its restructuring efforts.
Asian stocks reversed an earlier decline as utilities and IT stocks boosted the regional index. Markets in the region were mixed.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-03/sea-red-global-markets-traders-brace-recession-amid-global-trade-war
https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/countdown-to-fomc.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/stocks/futures
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd10y?countrycode=bx
it's the 'tutes who have the public narrative of ownership and then the owners of said institutions-which is not an easy, 'saucey' thing to find. Never thought the officers had control-thought this for a long time-just the public face.
it's been speculated that she was shown a certain 'video' of his exploits and bailed. out of the public eye for long time
and he bought it for this douche…'allegedly'.
How this one skated over the years is yet another tale of the yarn so to speak
go with that-plus a huge opp to wash money too. So who really owns it..him?
someone came in and said it wouldn't have much appreciation since it's overpriced already-think they were in that world. It would if the artist had an accident. Guess it does not matter if used for that purpose.