IS THIS DISINFO COMING FROM THE SAME SOURCES WHO CLAIM WE SHOULD NOT SAY "I TOLD YOU SO?"

>>6659341 pb

"Anons" need to stop this BS and stop putting it in Notables.

How many is shown via "Q team" communication that this is deliberte disinfo?

why? Because they want you to believe

1. Mueller is on POTUS side [ridiculous on its face]

2. The Mueller and POTUS colluded.

Why is that pushed so hard that fake baker after fake baker puts it into Notables as "commentary"

No it's not. Stop pushing it.

If it were true there would be no need to push and push and push, after it's demonstrably ridiculous BS.

This BS "take" allegedly "Q's take" has been going on for years.

Future proved that it is TOTAL BS and unnecessary to explain anything.

Isn't it just plain and "in everyone faces" that Mueller was NOT protecting POTUS but out to influence the mid-term election and into 2020 election by blockage and stall.

?

Just as the Mainstream Press can not admit it's wrong, and keeps spinning and spinning the same ridiculous BS

The PAY triots who were mis-informants , pushing the RR and Mueller White Hat [oh no, but we say "Grey" That's different] can not give up their ridiculous theory and keep pushing it to "save face"

STOP

This is NOT NOTABLE and should be taken out of Notables.

It directly contradicts Q com - see attached image.

Was that BS posted because it was the middle of the night, nobody around. I thought "night shift" was supposed to be the best shift?

>>6660044

look at the digits I got on that

Go to HELL "mueller white / gray hatters"

There's a "place" for everybody, even the fucking shills, I guess.

Free Speech and all

>>6660051

007 / John Dee / D. spy.

Did "magick" and spywork

"For her eyes only" = 007 = two zeros, eyes, 7, hand shade.

Wondered the connection, John D.s head of Rockefeller family for 4 / 5 generations?

>>6660079

I like that because "Repaired" jumps out.

Yep England / UK whatever you call it was involved with 9/11; was one of the perpetrators.

BBC Jane Standly , etc.,

MEDIA were the top perps.

>>6660100

Getting ahead of the news.

His followers are brain rinsed enough to "think" it's true?

Or do we believe "Q team" that the evidence will be too overwhelming and therefore undeniable?

YET The 4 or 5 percent who are unrecoverable will have an excuse to hang their beliefs?

They are all "out in the Ivy" with him? Howling at the Moon?

>>6660098

Stop this nonsense.

POTUS already told us.

They tried to blackmail POTUS to making Mueller FBI chief. When that failed Mueller was appointed SC

It's obvious that they threatened him; then came through with the threat with the 2+ years harassment which would've likely brought down ANY OTHER PERSON.

The "Mueller couldn't be FBI chief" IS DISINFO

None of those regs apply to POTUS

He can put anyone he wants there.

STOP!

>>6660101

Should have linked to this

>>6659737

For the above comment.

I apologize.

>>6660236

fucking liars.

Stop it

Why would POTUS say they all came to ask him for that, then?

Is POTUS a liar?

FUCK OFF

>>6660264

The people who say "LITERALLY" as an intensifier should just give up when all else they have other than "of course" and "litter ly" is a shitty weak delusional argument.

>>6660098

Is this a fucking mantra or not.

"can not be FBI do to blah blah blah"

Obviously pushed by Mueller team who failed.

Hi Weissman.

learn the Constitution.