Anonymous ID: c127a2 June 3, 2019, 10:58 a.m. No.6662157   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Siddiq is a very common Pakistan/Muslim name which has many variations in spelling both as a first name and as a second or last name.

See Sohale Siddiqi (appeared in photo of Hussein on sofa in NYC)

See Sumaria Siddique (one of Imran Awan's two wives who has become a whistleblower)

Compare and contrast –

Khan:

>My point is this. Some of the things that Donald Trump has done over the past 2-3 years, Londoners find abhorent and offensive […] introducing a ban on Muslim majority countries, standing up and defending white supremacists-neo-nazis-and-anti-semites-in-Charlottesville, amplyfing messages from racists in this country […]

Anons understand the falshoods in that laundry list that accused POTUS of racism.

Meanwhile, here is bit from Breitbart article:

>But 15 years ago, [Sidiq Khan] acted as Farrakhan's lawyer in an attempt to overturn the British government's long-standing ban on Farrakhan entering the U.K.

>Khan at the time said "there was no evidence at all" that Farrakhan's visits to other parts of the world had caused the kind of anti-Semitic and racially divisive problems that the British government feared Farrakhan would provoke.

>And he praised a British High Court judge who overturned the ban as "very brave and sensible."

>Though the ban was ultimately upheld on appeal, Khan was later forced to defend his support of Farrakhan in London's mayoral election earlier this year, telling London's Jewish News that his past job as a human rights lawyer meant "I had to speak on behalf of some very unsavory individuals," and adding "some of their views made me deeply uncomfortable, but it was my job."

>Khan's history tackling U.K. border controls on behalf of the Nation of Islam leader serves as an awkward parallel to his clashes earlier this summer with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Trump said he would make an exception to his proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S. for Khan, who countered that Trump was "ignorant" about Islam and would only serve to make both Britain and the U.S. less safe.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2016/09/16/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-ties-farrakhan-hed-rather-forget/

 

Also watch short vid of Sidiq defense of Farrakhan visiting UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k_lYfGNtKg

 

Alternate Source:

Hill, Dave (2016). Zac Versus Sadiq: The Fight to Become London Mayor. Double Q. ISBN 978-1-911079-20-0.

Anonymous ID: c127a2 June 3, 2019, 11:15 a.m. No.6662321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2359 >>2485

>>6662182

 

Think exchange.

What trade/deal would be BIG at this time?

Opportune?

 

Talk in exchange for freedom.

Whose freedom?

Who is shackled?

Who is (will become) restrained by events/revelations?

 

Double meanings.

 

Freedom to talk in exchange for putting someone or some thing in restraints? To be rid of?

Anonymous ID: c127a2 June 3, 2019, 11:30 a.m. No.6662449   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2474 >>2610

>>6662370

 

Spygate goes back to 1st Hussein Admin, closing year. But the foundation was dug and poured during GWB Admin.

 

The "infrastructure" was prepared and became well-used under Hussein. HRC looked forward to expanding both infrastructure and use.

 

The anti-Trump activities, esp post-election, are all improvised reactions to the disruption to the above.

 

Think analogy: Andy Ruiz Jr. v. Anthony Joshua.