Anonymous ID: e18152 June 3, 2019, 10:47 a.m. No.6662067   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6660720 pb

>>6661047 pb

 

Unusual operations to cover cable work?

Does the Navy really go around just bumping into things?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/7th-fleet-collisions-raise-questions-about-u-s-military-readiness-n826641

Anonymous ID: e18152 June 3, 2019, 10:48 a.m. No.6662078   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2100 >>2148 >>2192 >>2222 >>2307 >>2482 >>2619

Dig on Reasonableness of Possible Cabal Cables

>>>Apologies for lack of a good orderly presentation. My autism is good at making leaps, brain has a hard time slowing down and organizing a flow of thoughts after-the-fact

 

Just a Theory

>>>Please help connect dots, or correct my errors.

 

Motive >>>Would the Cabal want to have their own Cables? Duh

Opportunity >>>What could you do with missing >$23 Trillion?

Evidence >>>Here I set out to disprove likelihood and decided to look at global cable maps

 

My first thoughts to test ability to disprove likelihood:

All the major cables couldn’t possibly go through one area, right?

Alaska seems out of the way

US has two major coasts

What about the rest of the global traffic?

What minimum number of major access nodes would be required?

Do cables tend to follow the same routes?

 

Any cables near Alaska?:

I looked at a lot of global cable maps and saw that almost none of them show any cables near Alaska.

[link] https://www.google.com/search?q=undersea+data+cables+map&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjb2YbZ4c3iAhXJ7Z4KHe-vBxIQ_AUIECgB&biw=1672&bih=907#imgrc=_

One map shows an Alaska cable not present on other maps:

https://www.govtech.com/network/In-Our-Wi-Fi-World-the-Internet-Still-Depends-on-Undersea-Cables.html

 

Sauce:

Art of Mapping

http://artofmapping.blogspot.com/2011/10/submarine-cable-map.html

Issues about map accuracy.

TeleGeography map ($10,000 subscription to access) vs Open Source map by Greg Mahlknecht

 

>>>Known fact that some cable systems are missing from the available commercial maps

“There are data on which the two maps disagree as well. Many of the landing points are different, in that case usually differing by some miles between the two. Some cable systems missing from the TeleGeography map are present in Greg's Cable Map (e.g. CANTAT 3 in service since 1994). The criteria for inclusion in the TeleGeography map are not clear.”

 

On the theory about Alaska cable

Why would a Pacific hard-switch be desirable to the DS?

 

Is north Alaska shore a reasonable site?

>>>Pros

-Remote & restricted access

-US controlled turf

-Ocean access

>>>Cons

-South Alaska seems like lot less work while still being pretty remote?

 

Few maps show any cables going in Alaska direction

https://www.govtech.com/network/In-Our-Wi-Fi-World-the-Internet-Still-Depends-on-Undersea-Cables.html

One heads up from the CollisionArea right up to Alaska

Reasonably close to a possible nexus of all TransPacific cables.

Not conclusive but a workable place to put a hard-switch on all TransPacific cables.

 

Conclusion: There must be more than one hard-switch site

Must also be a TransAtlantic site

>>>Anon Poll: Greenland, Iceland, or other?

 

Control over global Water operations allows access to all of the worlds Data

Anonymous ID: e18152 June 3, 2019, 11:05 a.m. No.6662222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2260 >>2286 >>2512

>>6662078

Theory about possible 5Eyes cable access nodes

>>6662148

Greenland site exists. Sauce requested.

 

It's been bugging me for a long time… Why is 5Eyez comprised of US, Canada, England, Australia, NZ?

 

Territorial waters of: US, Canada, Australia, NZ

Cabal leadership nexus: England

 

Canada, Australia, NZ

I submit theory that these nations don't really "stand out" from the many that could have been included (Germany, France, etc), except for the fact that their WATERS provide data access points and they must HOST data access points that are compromised by HAMMER

Anonymous ID: e18152 June 3, 2019, 11:14 a.m. No.6662307   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6662078

If you have North Pacific and North Atlantic data to the US controlled, what else do you need to complete majority of data coverage?

 

+Satellites

+NZ/Australia: Third major data flow to the US.

 

As the US stands or falls, so does the World

The battle for the hearts and minds of the US

Control the data and you control the narrative

 

The rest of the world is important too, but an independent strong US is a critical threat to Cabal control.

US takedown requires DATA CONTROL for:

-Spy to collect dirt on as many as possible

-Identify subversives for post-unrest purge

-Choke point to kill spread of harmful narratives

-Neutralize ability of resistance to coordinate

-Compartmentalize

 

Just one element of 16-year plan to destroy America