Anonymous ID: a57301 June 3, 2019, 12:08 p.m. No.6662760   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2922 >>3072 >>3380

FOLLOW THE PEN

IS QUEEN WHITE HAT?

 

“The Queen’s official gifts to Mr Trump were a first edition of The Second World War by Winston S Churchill from 1959.

 

The crimson book features gold tooled decoration on the cover, spine and inner cover, an EIIR cypher in gold on the front, silk endpapers and hand-sewn headbands in colours of the US flag with all pages edged in gilt.

 

The monarch also gave Mr Trump a three-piece Duofold pen set – a fountain pen, rollerball pen and ball point pen with EIIR cypher – using the obsidian design, exclusively made for the Queen.

 

Mrs Trump was presented with a specially commissioned silver box with a handcrafted enamel lid.

 

Its royal blue decoration featured roses, thistles and shamrocks to represent the ceiling of the palace music room.”

 

This article has a spectacular gallery of photos of the visit. Unmissable.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7098297/The-Donald-landed-President-Trump-Lady-Melania-touch-London.html

Anonymous ID: a57301 June 3, 2019, 12:15 p.m. No.6662822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2898 >>2986 >>2995 >>3408

Is AG Bill Barr careful with his words? From the CBS interview:

 

“… And he [John Huber] was essentially on standby in case Mr. Horowitz referred a matter to him to be handled criminally. So he has not been active on this front in recent months and so Durham is taking over that role. The other issues he’s been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are winding down and hopefully we’ll be in a position to bring those to fruition.”

 

Fruition? If there was nothing there, would he use such a word?

 

Fruition – An idea that is made real, such as a plan or an apple, has come to fruition.

 

Would he use such a word if there was NOTHING there?

Anonymous ID: a57301 June 3, 2019, 12:29 p.m. No.6662915   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations held a hearing on Capitol Hill on the Clinton Foundation in December 2018.

 

Mark Meadows (R-NC), the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, led the hearing. Two Clinton Foundation whistleblowers spoke at the hearing. Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch also testified.

 

Meadows told the audience at the beginning of the hearing that the Department of Justice was unwilling to make John Huber available for the hearing[.] …

 

Witness John Moynihan and witness Lawrence Doyle accused the Clinton Foundation of using funding in the Clinton Health Initiative for trips and expenditures for personal use.

 

The witnesses told the committee they had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES because they kept losing it.

 

The Huber investigative team suddenly became interested in the evidence when they heard the two men were going before Congress.

 

————————————————————

 

Rep. Meadows: Why do you think Mr. Huber waited until November 30th to call you about 4 letters you had sent prior?

 

Mr. Moynihan: I don't know.

 

Rep. Meadows: Do you think it might have had to do with you coming here to testify? … They were fully aware because we had asked them to come and be a witness at this particular hearing. Then all of the sudden you get a phone call from what, Mr. Huber's second in command. Is that correct?

 

Mr. Moynihan: He was clearly the assistant US Attorney dealing directly with Mr. Huber.

 

Rep. Meadows: Well I find it just very coincidental that on November 30th, a few days before the hearing, after we notified them that we wanted them to come testify that all of the sudden they would start following up. So Mr. Doyle what did they say about the documents that you had provided them?

 

They lost the first two set of documents that were sent to them.

 

Rep. Meadows: So you're telling me that on November 30th they called you back and they couldn't find the first two submissions you had made to the Department of Justice and Mr. Huber? That they wanted you to send them again? That's what you're telling me?

 

Mr. Doyle: We're concluding that ourselves. That's what we're concluding.

 

————————————————————

 

OldFags, what is your comment of this?

Anonymous ID: a57301 June 3, 2019, 1:01 p.m. No.6663174   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3193

Huber was appointed originally in November 2017 and the FISA-related investigations were tacked on at a much later date.

 

On November 22, 2017, Sessions sent a letter to John Huber tasking him with reviewing issues that Congressional members had asked the AG to investigate. Attached to that letter were response letters that Sessions had sent to congressional members, which stated "This responds to your letters dated July 27, 2017, and September 26, 2017, in which you and other Members request the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate various matters, including the sale of Uranium One, alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation and other matters……..

 

In order to determine what other investigations Huber had originally been charged with leading a team of senior federal prosecutors to investigate, we go to the July 27, 2017, and September 26, 2017, letters from Congress to former AG Sessions.

 

In the first letter, signed by 20 members of Congress, they asked a Special prosecutor be appointed to investigate items they believed Special Counsel Robert Mueller was not investigating, calling them a "plethora of matters connected to the 2016 election and its aftermath," unrelated to Russia interference, including "actions taken by previously public figures like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey and Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton."

 

Those issues, as stated in that letter, include:

 

1) Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation;

 

2) The shadow cast over our system of justice concerning Secretary Cliton and her involvement in mishandling classified information;

 

3) FBI and DOJ's investigative decisions related to former Secretary Clinton's email investigation, including the propriety and consequence of immunity deals given to potential Clinton co-conspirators Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel and possibly others;

 

4) The apparent failure of the DOJ to empanel a grand jury to investigate allegations of mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and her associates;

 

5) The Department of State and its employees' involvement in determining which communications of Secretary Clinton's and her associates to turn over for public scrutiny;

 

6) Wikileaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potentially unlawful international dealings;

 

7) Connections between the Clinton campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, and foreign entities, including those from Russia and Ukraine;

 

8) Mr. Comey's knowledge of the purchase of Uranium One by the company Rosatom, whether the approval for the sale was connected to any donations made to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of that sale that had national security ramifications.

 

9) Disclosures arising from unlawful access to the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) computer systems, including inappropriate collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign;

 

The other five issues addressed include what Comey and Lynch knew of president Trump being wiretapped, Comey's reliance on Fusion GPS, Comey leaks, and the unprecedented amount of "unmasking" of individuals on the trump campaign, transition team or both by Comey, Lynch, Susan Rice, Samantha Powers and others.

 

Note: Some of these issues are will possibly be addressed in the upcoming IG report to some extent, which any criminal referrals will then be handed over to Durham,but any that is outside the IG's scope in his investigation that are not handed over to Durham will fall under the purview of the Huber investigation.

 

The September 26, 2017 letter focuses on the premature exoneration of Hillary Clinton, before she and other witnesses had even been interviewed by the FBI.

 

Both letters can be seen here (PDF).

 

Because of the overlapping investigations, Durham and Huber are working in direct coordination with the DOJ's Inspector General's Office, which is why both are awaiting the final report, along with any criminal referrals may be attached.

 

The Epoch Times highlights another interesting detail in regards to the Uranium One investigation: "Notably, Uranium One had significant holdings in Utah, where Huber is based, including a small town, a uranium mill, and more than 10,000 acres of uranium claims."

Anonymous ID: a57301 June 3, 2019, 1:26 p.m. No.6663350   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3360

US ready to talk to Iran ‘with no preconditions’ … if it behaves like ‘normal nation’ – Pompeo

 

https://www.rt.com/news/460892-pompeo-iran-normal-nation/

 

Normal nation=No Cabal and Deep State