>>6664215

House Democrats leading the probe. They will do a paltry investigation then close it, thereby trivializing any further attempts by Republicans in congress.

>>6664263

The frequency is real.

>>6664316

fake. she looks too fucking stupid to know what kind of rifle it is from the sound of the shots.

>>6664373

not name fagging..typed the captcha in the name.

so fuckheadanon

>>6664396

Dear God,

When will justice be served; the country is hurting.

Yours Truly,

cuntfanon

>>6664416

They are going to go state by state until every state enacts gun laws that make it impossible to own a weapon. They will strangle the gun manufactures and gun sales outlets. They will enact a "status" system that predermines if you are a risk. They will make you go through weeks of red tape in order to just apply for a weapon.

The longer the DOJ waits, the closer we get to socialism and the more the DS gets away with murdering civilians. I don't know about you but we could sure use something big on the board right now. This is just going to get worse.

>>6664377

I wonder why Trump isn't worried about deep fake videos.

>>6664524

>>6664507

Do you think Trump pulls up their credit reports himself? His first round of traitors tried to do him in.

>>6664562

They may win this. Trump cannot ignore shooting after shooting - they will continue for as long Democrats have the chance to win the White House back - or for as long as they think they do.

>>6664632

Still, no justice.

>>6664749

Never fear…the great Michael Horowitz and John Huber and Chris Wray will save us with their reports…any day now…like …

>>6664845

Goddamn…if this isn't a tell I don't know what is.

>>6664845

notable baker

Obama videos inevitable.

re. deep fake vids.

Call me crazy but wouldn't these vids be easy to debunk unless it was of a person talking to themselves in a room alone?

1. If the video is of someone speaking to an audience, everyone in the crowd could testify that it either was or was not the person in the video.

1. If the video is of someone speaking to others in a room, whomever took the video should be able to testify under oath that the video is authentic. Also others in the room could as well. Chances are a hidden video of someone will yield other actors.

1. If the video is a fake face on an already-past event, that event's source footage can be discovered.

Am I missing something? How could someone who was NOT faked prove that they were faked?