Anonymous ID: 72b8a6 June 4, 2019, 8:07 a.m. No.6669407   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9429 >>9472

this anon has been thinkin - which is admittedly dangerous on occasion.

and what ive been thinkin about is that the a core piece of our narrative is off. the piece surrounding seth rich and JA and the hacked/downloaded emails. somethings been bothering me.

and now i know what it is. The dims/cabal/HRC say:

we lost the election cuz muh russia hacked us and released all those emails.

we say:

bullshit. no russian hack. SR downloaded that shit onto a USB (wasnt it Binney that put out the analysis saying no fucking way that shit any thing other than a local copy??) and then somehow got that shit to JA.

 

but we also get lots of mixed messaging around JA. is he /ourguy? is he theirs? or something else? and SR? is he a patriot? did he really go off the reservation on his own?

 

there is another position available in addition to the their story and our story. i think the dems and cabal revel in deception. and the deception is this: they fucking suspected that HRC was going to lose (canceled fireworks anyone?).

 

and they set up an insurance policy for that case.

 

so the correct position is this:

 

the DNC emails were released (via whoever and whatever) BECAUSE SHE WAS GOING TO LOSE.

 

that's what i think we missed - SR didn't go rogue. he was told to release that shit. and once he realized he'd been played HRC and co cleaned up via MS-13, cuz while SR wasnt ever /ourguy he was perhaps decent enough that he wouldnt have allowed the narrative to play out.

 

maybe im wrong and should stop dreaming about this shit…..but it puts lots of shit in a new light.

Anonymous ID: 72b8a6 June 4, 2019, 8:18 a.m. No.6669472   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9546

>>6669461

>Without Seth Rich leaking to Assange and him having the bollocks to publish Hillary and JP, would we even be here?

perhaps not. but neither would there be any russian collusion narrative to drag POTUS down then would there? see my crazy post earlier this bread: >>6669407