Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, 10:47 a.m. No.6670362   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0417 >>0439 >>0514 >>0558 >>1030 >>1071

>>6670256

>Questions A Real Reporter Wants to Ask Mueller

 

Nolte: Dirty Cop Robert Mueller Selectively Edited Trump Lawyer Voice Mail

The Mueller Report (which debunked the media’s Russia Collusion Hoax and cleared Trump of obstruction) contains a transcript of a voicemail left by an attorney for Donald Trump to an attorney for former national security adviser Michael Flynn, that is selectively edited to look incriminating.

The transcript is in the second part of the report, the part where Dirty Cop Mueller attempts to pretend President Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice (Spoiler alert: he’s not — not even close).

 

If you look at the text of the voice mail that the Mueller Report (which debunked the media’s Russia Collusion Hoax and cleared Trump of obstruction) chose to publish, it gives an entirely different impression from the full transcript, which was just released last week.

 

This is a November 2017 voice mail message left by Trump’s attorney John Dowd for Flynn’s attorney, Rob Kelner:

I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t state it in starker terms. . . . [I]t wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with … the government. … [I]f . .. there’s information that implicates the President, then we’ve got a national security issue, . . . so, you know, . . . we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of protecting all our interests if we can …. [R]emember what we’ve always said about the ‘ President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains ….

 

But now you can read the full text of the message, which the Dirty Cops did not want you to see…

Hey, Rob, uhm, this is John again. Uh, maybe, I-I-I-‘m-I’m sympathetic; I understand your situation, but let me see if I can’t … state it in … starker terms. If you have … and it wouldn’t surprise me if you’ve gone on to make a deal with, and, uh, work with the government, uh … I understand that you can’t join the joint defense; so that’s one thing. If, on the other hand, we have, there’s information that … implicates the President, then we’ve got a national security issue, or maybe a national security issue, I don’t know … some issue, we got to-we got to deal with, not only for the President, but for the country. So … uh … you know, then-then, you know, we need some kind of heads up. Um, just for the sake of … protecting all our interests, if we can, without you having to give up any … confidential information. So, uhm, and if it’s the former, then, you know, remember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains, but — Well, in any event, uhm, let me know, and, uh, I appreciate your listening and taking the time. Thanks, Pal.

 

You see what Mueller did there? You see what he deliberately left out?

 

His transcript leaves the impression that Dowd is doing something inappropriate, is going behind everyone’s back looking to get information, even after the door closed on cooperation due to Flynn’s decision to make a deal with the special counsel. But…

 

If you look at the full transcript, Dowd is very specific about not wanting any information he should not have, not wanting any “confidential information.”

 

That one little sentence — “without you having to give up any … confidential information” — is what is called exculpatory, and there is only one reason for Mueller to remove it, and that is to further his attempt to frame Trump, even though he has to manufacture evidence, or in this case, hide exculpatory evidence, in order to do so.

 

Let’s also keep in mind that the Mueller Report (which debunked the media’s Russia Collusion Hoax and cleared Trump of obstruction) was over 400 pages long, so Mueller’s decision to selectively edit this voice mail had nothing to do with saving space.

 

What you have here is Exhibit A showing what a dirty prosecutor does to frame the accused.

 

Dowd, understandably, was furious over what Mueller did.

 

“This is clearly a baseless, political document designed to smear and damage the reputation of counsel and innocent people,” Dowd said last week.

 

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) described Mueller’s actions as an outright “fraud.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/04/nolte-dirty-cop-robert-mueller-selectively-edited-trump-lawyer-voice-mail/

Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, 10:53 a.m. No.6670397   🗄️.is 🔗kun

POTUS attracts pussy EVERYWHERE he goes! kek

 

UK’S ‘CHIEF MOUSER,’ LARRY, TAKES A CAT NAP UNDER TRUMP’S PRESIDENTIAL LIMO

https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/04/uk-chief-mouser-larry-cat-nap-trump-limo-beast/

Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, 10:58 a.m. No.6670428   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Radical Islamic Muslim '''@IlhanMN:

"ICE is an organization that has become increasingly militarized, brutal, and unaccountable; it must be abolished."'''

Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, 11:28 a.m. No.6670635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0684

REMEMBER WHEN CROOKED HILLARY BRAGGED ABOUT JOINING SNAPCHAT?

 

Pushing Pedophilia? Snapchat Installs ‘Love Has No Age’ Filter

A tech company has made a disturbing statement during the left-centric “Pride Month.”

 

For Snapchat, the LGBTQ might also include pedophiles. In the campaign for “Love Has No Labels” held by Snapchat, one of the options wasa “Love Has No Age” filter. While this filter appears to be defunct as of June 3, conservatives on Twitter pointed out the option over the weekend of June 1-2. Twitter user Ashley St. Clair posted a video of herself with the “Love has No Age” filter.

 

The filter had the options to say that love had no gender, race, or religion, as part of the mass-marketed Pride Month that infiltrates businesses and social media in June. But age did not seem to fit in the list, unless it was meant to justify pedophilia.

 

Big League Politics reported that “pedophiles have made a concerted push to join the ranks of acceptance granted to the LGBT community.” In the news, children dressed as sexualized drag queens have made headlines from NBC to the Huffington Post.

 

Love has an age, according to the 50 states: above 16. Anything below that age is considered statutory rape, depending on the state’s conditions. Generally, if adults above a certain age are involved it will be prosecuted as such.

 

Snapchat is an app that is designed for teenagers. 90 percent of the company’s 190 million daily users fall between the age of 13 and 24. The company is one of the few social media platforms that sets the minimum age at 13 in compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

 

This filter does not match well with Snapchat, which has a reputation for enabling pedophiles on the app. Fortune reported in 2017 that the disappearing messages that are Snapchat’s trademark make it easy for child pornographers to exploit their victims. 41 percent of underage victims were targeted through Snapchat in the year 2016. https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/techwatch/corinne-weaver/2019/06/03/pushing-pedophilia-snapchat-installs-love-has-no-age

Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, noon No.6670836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0849 >>1030 >>1071

>>6670711

>Planned Parenthood paid for prostitutes for staff, donors and guests who attended official functions.

 

CORRECTION: PP gets $500,000,000 a year in tax payer $$$ from the U.S. Govt. so "AMERICANS paid for prostitutes for staff, donors and guests who attended official functions."

Anonymous ID: 0b54e1 June 4, 2019, 12:02 p.m. No.6670847   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0899

>>6670684

>a guy in his mid twenties shouldn't have his life ruined for sleeping with a 14 year old girl who knows full well wtf she's doing

 

Go take a walk in HEAVY traffic. . . blindfolded, sicko fucktard!