IMPORTANT:

NASA's Global Mean Sea-Level data series correlates PERFECTLY with NOAA's global CO2 concentration record (r2 = 0.99), while those two series show a rather poor correlation with global temperature (r2 = 0.31)? This means that sea-level data have likely been faked!

https://twitter.com/NikolovScience/status/1135765249888358400

Another "coincidence" is that angle of both the sealevel rise according to NASA and the angle of co2 rise according to spectrum analysis on Mauna Loa is exactly the same as the angle from the free mason square and compass (pic related)

>>6671127

forgot the picture

>>6671266

Right and "they" faked it to a level where the angle of the rise exactly matches the angel from the free mason square and compass.

>>6671653

Notable baker?

Adjusted co2 and sealevel data matches freemason symbolism.

>>6671653

Notable baker?

Adjusted co2 and sealevel data matches freemason symbolism.

>>6671133

>>6671732

True but the hexes are squared, the x and y axis is not squeezed or pulled lke a harmonica

>>6671757

And the time interval and the Z value (relative change) is derived from NASA and NOAA