some are very quick to flip.
seems like a psyop when they do.
you reduce a complex narrative into just a few sentances. could you expound perhaps about things that 'hook' a 20 year old that a 30 year old finds incorrect?
I agree that the books are dense and hard to phathom, however within the comtext of their availability, and their effect upon readers, they are at least notable and useful for 20 and 30 year olds, at least to understand why some, not you, hold Ayn in esteem.
Maybe a bit more? or a link to a review that makes the points that you feel we need to here about why she "ain't all that" so to speak.
for example, I feel, about Hemingway, that he wrote an amazing and concise product. And it was easy to read because he had a master's ability to craft a narrative and to weave in and out various natural styles of speaking into long passages of story-line.
What I also found about him was that his ideas about people . . . were naive and tainted by his need to be a porpagandist for the ongoing world revolution. And he never broke from their ranks.
Orwell was in Spain during a time that Hemmingway was too. What Orwell saw turned him away from the extreme nature of that tainted cause of that particular revolution. He went back to England and wrote a few mediocre novels.
and in the same sense as Hemingway was a great 'writer' but tainted about politics and the ways of the cabal-control-creepiness, Orwell was a mediocre writer who had a steller understanding of the control-creepiness and wrote novels that were great for what they did as a 'soft-reveal'.
I never took very much time with Rand. She seemed to be too popular amoung a group that I found only focused upon social political narratives of what I thought of as 'social darwinism'.
But self reliance and self preservation are important. I think Rand using the term 'selfishness' threw me off from her. The virtue is never in selfishness, but there is a virtue is self-caring, self-reliance, and self-preservation. so what may have been a 'trolling' on her part put me off to her so I can't really give her a good review.
Can you give some bullet points about what put her off to you? Why do you dis like her enough to post about it here?
I must be missing a live feed you guys have a hook on.
the youth of Diana upon the day of her marriage must be shown as important in that at such an age the denial of obvious things would be shown as 'psychiatric' 'issues'.
History must remember that John Jon and Diana were roughly the same age, and may have had the same kinds of 'denial of obvious things' that were played off as 'psychiatric' 'issues'. This may be called the bond of 'being the same age'
Other famous people of almost the same age? Bill Hicks. Barrack O'Barry
What if . . . ? ?
every single narrative is always partly fake,
and the only real choices were to figure out which ones to use to result in not becoming a causulty? and helping others to not be that too?
Does that explain some of the sudden and wild veering of some of the 'funner' obvious deep troll people like Inspector Danger and FameAnjel?
Take away the chains of the fake and
do not respond to the AI nudgers
did it not get noted last night, and a live stream during and , and everyone in subsequent breads going 'oh .ohhhh we tried' and 'ya, you did' verification shills?
and now you.
Everyone is kind of expecting the Disney pyramid to . . . have some architectural changes.