lurq moar - and learn about telescopes.
or do you not believe your own lying eyes?
>I personally keep my mind open
>at the very least that the moon landing footage is fake
millions of pussy hats - the day of inauguratiuon
a blimp, that 'just shows up' across the pond
orange wristbands for the feed wagon
not just the level of organization,
but funding
"grassroots"
sry. i thought using a telescope was a skill that any sighted person would have. still getting used to the IQ level of our new clientele
>which I can't
anon shrugged
>That would simply show me that somehow a flag got put up there.
does not equal technology capable of lunar landing
your logic escapes me
and you.
>I even added that there could have been actual moon landings in the meantime, done in secret.
but the actual footage? not possible.
again, logic.
>And NASA also destroying all the stuff they made for the so called moon landing, which was insanely expensive.
pre - SDK 8085 computing was extremely expensive. a TRS-80 cost as much as a used car back in the day, and a 5M hard drive unit ( to eliminate stacks of 5 1/4" floppies cost $2,000 and was the size of a large carry-on bag.
why destroy these archaic monstrosities indeed?
NASA IS a scam - it is a front for our secret ballistic & satellite and surveillance and other programs, including clown ops. or was, back in the day.
but just 'cuz you are incapable of the math required for orbital rendezvous ( available for centuries, just waiting on materials technology) does not mean that all humans are…
plz , deal with your own incapacity in private i.e. lurq moar until you can contribute something coherent and cohesive.
this will not work on "magnets are magic" tards
it will simply reinforce their 'beliefs'
field strength is invisible, and therefore a hoax.
>NASA is incapable of funding a warehouse somewhere?
where is your warehouse for your used IBM? if you didn't preserve it for antiquity, you are being somewhat hypocritical -
oh wait - you still use it? you are text only with your 2400 baud USRobotics thingy?
>you still haven't shown me the telescope for $100 that is capable of showing me the American flag on the moon.
ok, i yield. you can't afford a powerful telescope,
so the moon landings are a hoax.
i yield to masterdebater
c u next bred
the government raided the 'news'
the 'news' reported that it was an attempt by government to prevent "massive public surveillance" info from leaking
anon wondered what massive surveillance would go beyond project echelon and its descendants
anon then wondered what the real purpose for the raids were
can't tell if you are being supportive, sarcastic, or msm blind - kek.
npr?
anon will take that as further reason to doubt the 'news' postulate for motive
ok, npr is clown op
AlJizz is telling us what the Emir of Qatar wants us to think.
still waiting to determine if this is simply
4 a.m. talking points
or
'independent' verification