>>6678145

You seem to think this is about you and your hobbies. Even if "we" are Trump's 'base' and are the core demographic for him - that still doesn't lend anything to the idea that 'he is letting us be abused.'

We are an edgy group that often toes the line on what is generally regarded as acceptable in terms of discussion - when we bother to pay attention to that, at all. We have always charged toward the censorship with blades drawn. Saying that "President Trump" allows us to be abused is a rejection of the idea that we do this by choice and with gusto.

There will be a time and a place for President Trump and our legal system to get to these things. Our job is to be the ones on the front lines, not being cowed by the censorship threats. Be clever as serpents.

>>6678078

And what are we supposed to do about it?

This is the trap the liberal activists have fallen into. Get angry and hold protests and demonstrations that get ignored at the institutional level. Then egg people or throw milkshakes at them (support your local burger yass queen slay).

The only thing the left has been allowed to accomplish is the suppression and harassment of the non-left. None of their environmental activism has changed anything. None of their humanitarian efforts have improved anything. None of their "awareness" has changed the game.

Once you realize their entire narrative is being directed by the people who control the money and the research grants - you realize that they are effectively being set up to take the blame for "causing" what we now call "get woke, go broke." These policies were always the agenda of these large financers and 'global elites' - the left has just been turned into a meat shield.

So - sure - we do "spread awareness" as we can - but there is only one thing that is going to fix this. An application of force. Either that force comes from our institutions of law, or it comes from us as people. Or some combination thereof.

We believe in the rule of law. That means there are some things we can do, and some things we leave to the law to handle. The only exception to this is when the system is so corrupt or inept that it must be removed and replaced. We are sitting at the edge of that decision, to be sure - but there can be no half measures. Either we see how President Trump handles this - or we go full-on mad max and roll the dice of apocalypse.

Going down the same path of the left of "we need to pay attention to this specific form of corruption" is just a trap to obscure the bigger picture - both the scale of corruption and the events of winning. If people want to choose one thing Q said and zero in on it like a scopelocked booter, then they are doing it wrong and how the enemy wants.

>>6678524

Department of natural resources, probably. Or wildlife/recreation. The federal government owns most uninhabited or minimally inhabited land, having designated it some park or another.

Goes back to FDR.

>>6678557

Here is a question related to that point.

If… Slush funds related to the Clintons are used to fund Al Qaeda and the Islamic State militants….

And if… The Clintons are closely affiliated with the media machine…

And if… The CIA was given the directive of creating media shell companies and purchasing shares in news media in support of actions like Operation Cyclone….

Is it proper to suggest that media "journalists" are likely part of a terrorist network in league with militant cells they cover?

>>6678562

The left distracts people by having them pay attention to "issues." Laser pointer.

So, you want to get uppity about the border. We have made our opinions on thar clear and continue to do so. President Trump has said he will, and things are advancing on that - albeit not as quickly as we would like.

Shrieking at Trump or others on the internet isn't going to make it happen faster. Or differently. This is the trap of the left. Nor will egging people or throwing milkshakes at them.

The imperative has already been made clear. Q is here because people like me stood up and said "President Trump is your only hope of staying my hand, and I do not believe it will be more than a temporary respite from the globalist machine - unless he understands the problems and moves with a whole team, nothing can be done. After which, I am going to destroy it all." Q said as much, did he not?

Activism doesn't change things. Action does. Action without knowledge is flailing. Action with knowledge is conserved.

Give people knowledge so they can take conscious actions, rather than give knee-jerk reactions.