Where are all the autists? I noticed a notable on May 30 about the DOJ IG posting his report up to March 31st. (but not posted to DOJ website until May 29th) Thought the autists would be all over it, so I kept working on a different dig. –NOTHING from you swinging dicks..what you doing?

You all post shit like this:

[Placeholder - OIG Report & Findings]

[Placeholder - OIG report FBI, DOJ, & Media Coll]

[Placeholder - OIG report Exe B_ABCs & Media Coll]

[Placeholder - OIG report Foreign ASST_D1]

[Placeholder - OIG report Foreign_Insert(s)_ORec & Info Diss]

[Placeholder - OIG report FISA Abuse DIR_INDIR_Source_DIS]

[Placeholder - OIG report Umbrella SPY & Targeting]

[Placeholder - OIG report OTR_C_]

And say..Nothing is being done.

We have more than we know. The IG gave us tons of clues in the report but you are all busy fighting with shills. Where are the autists?

Examples:

[Placeholder - SPEC_C_pub]

Again this is three separate investigations in FBI and DOJ – this sounds like it’s in response to Mueller. Or it could be related to Comey and Hillary.

FBI version

The OIG recommend that the Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials

DOJ version

The OIG recommend that the Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials

FBI (Comey probably, but Mueller just did it too)

The OIG recommend that the Department consider making explicit that, except in situations where the law requires or permits disclosure, an investigating agency cannot publicly announce its recommended charging decision prior to consulting with the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or his or her designee, and cannot proceed without the approval of one of these officials

– to be continued

>>6680002

[Placeholder - OIG report FBI, DOJ, & Media Coll]

The OIG recommend that the FBI consider whether (a) it is appropriately educating employees about both its media contact policy and the Department’s ethics rules pertaining to the acceptance of gifts, and (b) its disciplinary provisions and penalties are sufficient to deter such improper conduct.

[Placeholder - OIG report Foreign ASST_D1]

The OIG recommend that the Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

The OIG recommend that the FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b) providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any nongovernmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations.

[Placeholder - OIG report FISA Abuse DIR_INDIR_Source_DIS]

The OIG recommend that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General take steps to improve the retention and monitoring of text messages Department-wide

Continued….

>>6680018

[Placeholder - OIG report OTR_C_]

The OIG recommend that the Department consider developing practice guidance that would assist investigators and prosecutors in identifying the general risks with and alternatives to permitting a witness to attend a voluntary interview of another witness, in particular when the witness is serving as counsel for the other witness.

Repeated for both ODAG and FBI – So they are looking into this in both DOJ and FBI

The OIG recommend that Department ethics officials include the review of campaign donations for possible conflict issues when Department employees or their spouses run for public office.

The OIG recommend that the Department consider providing guidance to agents and prosecutors concerning the taking of overt investigative steps, indictments, public announcements, or other actions that could impact an election.

The OIG recommend that the FBI consider (a) assessing whether it has provided adequate training to employees about the proper use of text messages and instant messages, including any related discovery obligations, and (b) providing additional guidance about the allowable uses of FBI devices for any nongovernmental purpose, including guidance about the use of FBI devices for political conversations.

Come on Anons- WAKE UP. I found this shit if 15 minutes of reading that report.

They are putting this stuff out there and hoping we find it..WTF

>>6680023

All I ever see here anymore is people posting screengrabs of tweets.

Normies fighting with Shills because they don't understand Lurk Moar

Anons calling Bakers names and creating bullshit.

Anons fighting with other anons over stupid shit like who is a paytriot. Stop dividing Qanons.

We were chosen for a reason. Do your job. Dig for Fucks sake. No body is monitoring the stuff that matters …Get the fuck off twitter and do what we are here to do.

>>6680002

This is the link to the PDF from the DOJ

Feel free to read it in betweet tweeting to each other.

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/r190529.pdf

>>6680002

One other thing. The report list a start date of June 14 2018. A one year marker perhaps..or 2 days ahead of schedule on June 12th.

We have more than we know.

>>6680096

Wrong pic