when another anon brought up George magazine yesterday they had a even more shitty copy and i posted the one you are referencing. I think the anon switched their tiny image bad picture with that one.
I had did a search for that magazine cover and it was one of the better images.
However after posted i noticed the side was cut off.
That anon did not have bad intentions, nor did they crop that picture.
That was how it was, and i'm actually the anon that first posted it ( that cut off image)yesterday.