Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 5, 2019, 11:43 p.m. No.6683694   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3720

>>6683685

>Why are they pushing it?

 

Why does anyone assume it's shills pushing it? To me it sounds pretty fucking notable; a very probable arkancide that happened extremely recently. Why WOULDN'T it be in the notables numerous times?

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:15 a.m. No.6683786   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6683714

>Boats are crying for men. Go figure…

 

Gov't and Mil are going to be hurting for people now that marijuana is legal in so many places. Lots of people abandoning alcohol and tobacco entirely and just blazing up here and there (some doing it 10+ times a day ha)

 

As long as marijuana is a disqualifier for pretty much everything, the govt is going to miss out on a whole lot of bright young people. I do not understand the stigma. It does not make you retarded and as long as you aren't smoking within 8-10 hours of work or duty you are affected very little.

 

Nobody under 25 should smoke, though, is my opinion.

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:22 a.m. No.6683804   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3873

>>6683785

>Thanks Trump for screwing over the next generation of Americans.

 

What's it like getting paid to shill? Do you feel good about your work? Do you even care? Is the pay decent? I know the Correct The Record people got paid pretty damn well (see attached). Do you believe in what you do or not care or what?

 

Drop the pretense and shoot the shit with me for a bit. Literally no one is fooled, we know who and what you are, you probably won't get in trouble for answering some of my questions (though you are working for people who kill people that get in their way… hmm)

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:25 a.m. No.6683816   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3887

>>6683803

>That would be your Corry Bookers, Maxine Waters and your Ocassional Cortex types.

 

Maxine Waters has been around a lot longer than Booker. Would be more apt to lump Booker in with Harris and people like Beto, Buttgreg, etc.

 

Waters has made a lot of money making sure Hawthorne and Inglewood can't recover financially or demographically or in any other ways. She's up there with Feinstein, despite being way, way stupider. With these people, tenure means a lot.

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:41 a.m. No.6683873   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6683804

 

The shills never react to these posts that hit right at home. Name the beast and he loses the security of believing he's getting away with it. Ah, well. One day I could be doxxed, too, but I genuinely believe in what I do, and I don't get paid for it. I definitely wouldn't benefit from being doxxed but this is the only world we've got and I can't let that fear stop me from doing what I can to protect it.

 

To paid social media posters reading this: think long and hard about what you're choosing to be a part of. I have been out of work before, and I know how compelling a paycheck is when you desperately need money to stay off the street. But ethics matter. Morality matters. What you are doing is not harmless, victimless, or acceptable. Please–stop while you can. Stop before you are too deep. Stop before you suddenly realize you are a part of something you'll regret forever.

 

t. Nobody

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:45 a.m. No.6683884   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6683868

>The royal's live on an allowance…… Dig on that.

 

Heya, toilet boy. Just a reminder, you don't need an apostrophe in a plural word like "royals." Apostrophes only go in words that end with 's' because they are in the possessive tense

 

The royals are inbred and pointless

 

Prince Harry's wife is a dirty, ass-eating slut

 

If you're using the possessive tense on a word that ends with 's', you can either put the apostrophe after the 's' and then leave it alone, or you can put a 2nd 's' after the apostrophe (which looks like shit in my opinion but both are correct supposedly)

 

The inbred royals' genes are fucked up like a soup sandwich

The inbred royals's genes are fucked up like a soup sandwich

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:46 a.m. No.6683895   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6683880

>The subject is still in the shadows….too bad.

 

I noticed this, too. I wish either A) Q would rip off the band-aid and let the dice fall where they may, or B) Q would identify those who are ready for the information and find a way to graduate them to a more advanced version of QResearch.

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:53 a.m. No.6683919   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3942

>>6683913

>sickness of hairless

 

Admittedly, I like a bit of hair as well. Less than what's "natural" but more than "shaved"

 

But 99% of the porn industry thinks they have to shave everything (probably because someone out there is trying to normalize pedophilia)

 

Is English your first language? "sickness of hairless"… honestly.

Anonymous ID: 869ec2 June 6, 2019, 12:56 a.m. No.6683926   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3965 >>4010

>>6683910

>Oh my lord anons are posting pussy!!!

 

I like to imagine how the notable paytriot figures react to the porn when they're on this board looking for shit to hawk to their followers. Additionally, probably every single alphabet has people in here. Intelligence analysis is seldom fun or rewarding work.

 

From me to you, analysts, I hope I have brought a few happy moments to your boring work!