Expand you Thanking
Thanks for making it realer than it was!
U know who U are.
It's well known that some of the people running things were playing favorites.
If you had a high up 'fren' you could avoid the duty that would get you killed.
Look for who was 'in the Band' (I mean real bands) and perhaps find out where nests of 'untoucable' special friends were stationed.
If you were 'in the band' you didn't get put in the front and marched off to die.
You don't get in the band unless you know the man
Some of the Brits were exceptional psychopaths and planned for the murder of 10's of thousands needlessly, like what happened in Dresden which was not called a 'war crime' though it probably could have been; intentional mass murder.
brutal.
for some reason I image like a tiny posedian or something riding them like they are sea horses with saddles on their heads. Picture relates.
very brutal meme
Smell my serious high crimes and misdemeanors
anyone remember when Q posted once at 2 AM eastern?
that was a long night.
the nature of communications is such that you can't really catalog which parts are meaningful and what they mean.
There are rules for journalism.
'free speech' includes the idea of things also having other purposes.
'parody' is a proper use of media that most consider to not be 'fake', but also not really journalism.
and then the final point: who, exactly, gets to label my things as 'unproven' and what does 'prove' or 'proven' or 'unproven' mean?
who polices the censors?
In our system special groups get to bully all the rest. Strictures of speech arrise under the guise of 'preventing' 'hate'. The codes, and their implementation, imply something that isn't real, and grant a bigoted special status to some small and petty discusting controling few at the expense of all the rest. And that, it self, could be said to be hateful. But if you tell them that, they'll put you on their 'not frenz' list, black ball from your profession, trash your name in the press, and make really really mean memes about you, and post them on 8ch . . .
and if you had pretty eyes and reminded the band leader of his family, you got a coosh job playing funerals out of harms way.
you don't get in the band unless yoy know the man.
and posting it twice . . .
I might not have said anything if it didn't have a name on it twice different.
The suggestion of 'rising up' by a name fag irritates me.
I say it's a cabal narrative becuase it pits demographics against each other in a nascent operant suggestion for violence.
Is it 'depraved' or is it 'jaded?'
It's distasteful to me.
your comment is a cross between rouse and satire? Not sure what your point of view is on maintaining a nonviolent stance or if you were making hay of my comment, and 'satircally' supporting the cause of the aggitator?
Oh, well.
POTUS retweeted Jack on at least one occasion
whose more of a man-candy guy? Jack or Anjel?
you repeat your operant word phrase twice.
do they teach you that in 'mind-fuck' school where they implaint your programming?
your repitive meaningless phrase and random political imagery gets you a pay check?
Talentless meme ideas puke distastefull wordings.
can you make four random memes that say that? you 'll need four random pictures.
sickness of hairless
bikini wax shill and
corpse looking creations of discusting fetish mind . . .
, I'll pass on your council of special people who get to censor. Your request for overlord status to control the work of others is denied.
whatever.
I was typing a response and saw something that's really not fair to put up in my face.
I kneejerked a shitpost.
get real.
your fetish of posting that is indictive of something that would be mean to say here about you.
you know people are addicted to orgasm not porn.
no one who can surf to here needs your shitpost porn of fetich latex looking 'models' . you only put it here to lower the vibrational energy and sidetrack people into porn.