Anonymous ID: 2a3d73 June 6, 2019, 7:36 a.m. No.6685242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5254 >>5319

NPS: national park service

always has articles and photographs.

Here is a picture of D-Day type landing craft being manufactured in 1942

 

https://www.nps.gov/articles/images/NARA-BOSTON-CNY-LCMs-Bldg197_CMS_cropped.jpg

https://www.nps.gov/articles/the-boston-navy-yard-during-world-war-ii.htm

Anonymous ID: 2a3d73 June 6, 2019, 7:44 a.m. No.6685274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5287

>>6685254

today is the aniversary of the battle.

the next few days is the aniversary of all the men who were sent in to collect body parts and send them home.

Like it or not most of them were tasked with something horrible.

we need to recall these things and hold this knowledge up into the light of day to teach the next generations.

your trite shitpost-one-liners have a general flavor of either you are drunk/high, or an AI.

Anonymous ID: 2a3d73 June 6, 2019, 7:51 a.m. No.6685314   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6685287

That's fair.

Hey American men didn't much discuss what they knew and saw on those beaches from those, and subsequent days. I did to get to here a friend account his time there one day while he was in a respite at a Hospital for a time. He never gave much detail nor did he enjoy the subject.

In recollection it dawned on me how much about those days was ever told to us as children other through the media. But we'd here about it at times. Not often from someone who was really there.

Anonymous ID: 2a3d73 June 6, 2019, 8:17 a.m. No.6685435   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5438

>>6685372

you mean that Newsqueek didn't have that kind that the reeltoreel tape doesn't burst into flames if it gets diconnected from the system?

 

Is it really suppression of 'the press' if no one reads their magazine ever, and they don't even print it anymore?

 

Is anyone really keeping anyone from writing and saying what they want? I think not.

 

Does the confiscation include the people there being able to still get access to data that they might need?

 

how do they know, the confiscators, that those servers weren't part of some bigger thing and, if disconnected, never able to be useful for anything else (like so much tech is).?

 

If Newsqueek was used as a conduit for conspiracy, or trafficking, one would imagine that they'd have to deal with the consequences.

 

given that the magazine doesn't really exist anymore, what has been it's purpose these last few years other than as some neffarious back-chan for the flim-flam of the swamp-rat-people who don't play nice?