Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 6:49 a.m. No.6685008   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5021 >>5027

>>6684983

>โ€ฆbut what makes it shilly?

because it's an unvetted, untrusted outside source and WE KNOW FOR A FACT there are plenty of actors out there working against us who work to position themselves exactly like he does.

 

i'm fine with anons keeping eyes on, and even posting what it's up to once in a while. by all means, indulge your penchant for pied pipers.

but after all these months, THESE YEARS, how in the very fuck can you be surprised that anons give you flak for it?

just make your damn eyefan post if you truly must, and don't feed replies.

the ensuing "debate", if nothing else, makes it even shillier

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.6685027   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5095 >>5103

>>6684985

>He seems to be in the know on some stuff. I was just asking what other anons thought about this tweet.

see >>6685008 , please.

we've had to deal with twatter fuckers like that one since the start.

though he may be one of the less explicitly repulsive ones, he is no less suspicious - if not more so.

you are showing an unfortunate lack of having lurked moar enough.

 

>>6685021

i said none of that, i'm telling you how to go on posting eyespey posts without turning it all to shit.

just post and move on, don't get into replies, is all.

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 7:03 a.m. No.6685098   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6685086

>Just look at the followers and then what's been posted and reconcile.

exactly.

>>6685082

>This goddamn slide. Every.fucking.day

Tiresome, yes, but on the good side, it's quite revealing: here we are telling them to just make a damn post and move on, and they go on and on about how awesome and wonderful and God bless him, etc.

Showing how far away they've wandered from the eyespy research board to end up here - and with what intentions

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 7:04 a.m. No.6685103   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6685095

>Maybe you are the shill for jumping on people when they are posting something. I will post whatever I want

>>6685027

>i said none of that, i'm telling you how to go on posting eyespey posts without turning it all to shit.

>just post and move on, don't get into replies, is all.

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 7:19 a.m. No.6685175   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6685149

> so FK the naysayers nobody forcing them to read his timeline or this board .. take what you need and leave the rest.. Just like on this board

Ok, great. Now please apply this same attitude to those that scream against the eye posts.

Don't bite.

 

See half of this bread for what happens otherwise.

Obvs if finkel spams all he wants, the spy fans get to do the same.

But unless they're here to make everyone else waste time, they know not to get involved in drama

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 7:38 a.m. No.6685255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5272

>>6685241

>either way move along .. not playing your silly game

yes.

yes you are.

 

you will never not get criticism for posting eyethespy. please then apply your own advice, so we don't have the debate all over again every time.

 

i like to see what he's up to and certainly won't waste anytime running after him on twitter - single caps/posts are a welcome service.

all the "omg he's so great" posts, however, serve no constructive purpose.

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 7:48 a.m. No.6685295   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5315

>>6685272

> for people that are supposed to be Q researchers you do cry a lot

hey remember how we're an open board and under constant psyops/attacks?

it's almost like shills who wanted to waste everyone's time would do exactly what tickles you, and keep responding.

if ya could keep that in mind

that'd be GREAT

 

<DID you read that part

?

>i like to see what he's up to and certainly won't waste anytime running after him on twitter - single caps/posts are a welcome service.

>all the "omg he's so great" posts, however, serve no constructive purpose.

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 8:20 a.m. No.6685452   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6685410

>the jeepers

meh, remember how often they've tried (sars, pig flu, avian flu, ebola, etc)โ€ฆ

might be too optimistic andi sure hope they don't get to try anymore, but i guess if they had a chance at succeeding they would've already

Anonymous ID: 7e4fd9 June 6, 2019, 8:57 a.m. No.6685614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5634 >>5696

>>6685582

>This is a day to day account of the movements and decisions of the players involved, and at some point it will be crystal clear that this entire war was madness.

>There is no commentary only facts.

intrsting.

and to think of all the analysis of Hitler's bad movesโ€ฆ but then a lot of allied moves were mad as well - until you replace unknown motives for nefarious