How many of the bakers came here from 4chan?

Did they leave 4chan to devote their time here?

How many of the very very active "anons" that make all the posts came from 4chan?

And what I mean is, they apparentely FOLLOWED Q here, from there?

How many "anons" came here AFTER this board started?

How many "anons" here LEFT other "chans" to focus on posting here?

How many "bakers"?

Where are the "non-anon" posters? Why are there NONE?

Shouldn't there be LOTS of posters here that never posted on a "chan" before Q?

Shouldn't they be the MAJORITY?

And given that, shouldn't this board have a completely different culture than it does?

Why did 8chan get created?

Why REALLY?

>>6689444

Why do "anons" post GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI memes?

It seems to me this is an awfully striking fact, and one that hardly redounds in favor of "anons"…

>>6689455

Why is this board a busy busy news aggregator?

Why does this activity churn along at a fast pace, nonstop, for no apparent reason?

The board aggregates news and random tidbits, then sends it all downstream, to be dumped into oblivion.

This pointless activity is treated like the prime function of the board.

I mean, it's not totally pointless. The information isn't useless.

But it is not natural, in any way, this machine like activity of news aggregation.

Do anons realize how weird it is? What it looks like?

>>6689474

It's mostly useless.

Nothing solid exists, except controlled-narrative threads like "the Jewish question uberkike".

The "main thread" is a fast moving stream, which places strict limits on many things.

conversations can't be carried over days. They get annihilated. So conversations are all fragmentary, hit-and-run. People CAN'T maintain stable discussions on this board.

Information has no solid form except the bloated and dubious "dough" materials. That is all controlled by "bakers". There is no penetrating the reins of information. Why is this?

There is a ceaseless flow of posts, but they are almost all filler. Then there is news aggregation, and those are essentially the only things the board can do.

>>6689493

Are questions difficult for you?

Then try harder.

Good luck fren.

>>6689517

Yours is the talk of "you", and mine is of me.

What I say is quite true, and people can simply look.

Now, I know from my own experience that censorship is in full effect here. But even for those ignorant, the fact is clear that the boards feature threads that contradict the spirit of Q's post, and ape "nazi" era 4chan.

I mean, it is just obvious.

And, as I said, the "general threads" are stuffed full of fast moving activity that renders them almost non-interactive. It is just automated news aggregation and other emulated activities, flying past.