Anonymous ID: 76e847 June 6, 2019, 7:21 p.m. No.6690361   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0691

Platforms such as Twitter, Faceberg, and YouTube do not have to censor contributors. They are literally protected by law to allow people to post whatever the fuck they want.

 

https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230

 

Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. ยง 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. Though there are important exceptions for certain criminal and intellectual property-based claims, CDA 230 creates a broad protection that has allowed innovation and free speech online to flourish

Anonymous ID: 76e847 June 6, 2019, 8:05 p.m. No.6690750   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6690691

Have to admit, I was against IBOR at first until all this info came out that they are partially govt owned, and granted additional protections not afforded true privately owned corporations. Everything is so fucked up.

Anonymous ID: 76e847 June 6, 2019, 8:33 p.m. No.6691010   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6690979

They were a collegy-funny site for edgy humor in early 2000s, then "changed". They had an excellent video on the Bush v Gore speeches. It was a compilation that demonstrated that they both said the exact same stupid fcking bullshit at all their rallies. Shortly after that, they became entirely irrelevant, and then became a "news site".

 

Pic related.