>>6694356

By this logic, gold and silver rounds are "unconstitutional."

The original coinage act specified that the government was to make mints available for people to coin currency to a standard. If you were to bring silver or gold into the mint, it could be coined as legal tender valid for satisfying debts in the eyes of the law.

Crypto is no different than an asset. It is what it is. I do not believe it will replace the dollar, but I do believe it will play a critical role in the world moving forward. I don't think the concept is fully matured or "battle tested" just yet - and any idiot can claim to have a crypto-currency for people to throw money at - so there's a social maturity that has to be reached with it, as well - the same way we had to stop believing in nigerian royalty sending us emails. Email and the internet weren't bad ideas - just thinking you were going to get rich by sending money to po boxes.

>>6694442

That is exactly what they are doing. They want violent outbursts from the right.

Chalk up one more reason to why Q is here.

The people suggesting Q is a psyop or "getting us to do something other than revolt" aren't wrong per se. The thing is that, again, moves and counter-moves. The proverbial they, when cornered by the system of law, will then try and rally the armed public against that system of law.

That is why they are going to do all they can to make us feel as if we are losing. They want fear and outrage.

I have been tracking Buzzfeed on facebook, lately. They have agent provocateurs in their comments section who will harass people on both left and right. They want the right to get angry and frustrated - then do something stupid and have everyone dog-pile into a war.

>>6694541

Sometimes, the best way to seed an idea is with a bit of "close" misinformation. It may not be the same Nader… But…. They'll remember when we were "wrong," won't they?

The court jester is always the gate keeper. The fact that it isn't the same nader will not change the things each nader did. Let them earn a victory or two they will remember… Right up until we were… Not exactly wrong, either.

>>6694591

https://youtu.be/R2IiSi2Y1Eg

Anime weebs are squealing like teenage girls everywhere.

>>6694567

They are "lost."

What mount Gox was doing was no different than if a bank was telling people there was gold in the vault when someone was letting thieves (or friends) take that gold out of the vault.

No one can sign gold into existence. No one can sign new bitcoins into existence.

Now… There is a bit of a trick as the ledger of bitcoin is public, and you can therefore trace "lost" coins. This means that a thief who spends stolen bitcoin can have their spending traced to legal transactions and bitcoins, themselves, deemed "stolen" or "hot." In theory and at the edge of what has been done. So, bitcoin proper isn't truly fungible.

This is why I am more a fan of Monero, because the ledger is double-blind encrypted. You can give up a cryptography key that will reveal your exact transactions for the purpose of audits and the like - but the process actually is designed to be opaque to bulk data analysis. It also natively supports self-executing contracts and other stuff that has been bolted on over the top of bitcoin.

Businesses and entrepreneurs will be more likely to use various cryptos. I don't expect most of the public to use them. Not the open standards we have today - checking may eventually be replaced by a crypto-currency system maintained by partnered banks, but that will be run in the background.