Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 1:39 p.m. No.6696162   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6172 >>6247

>>6696106

>"Why does the script process my post ALMOST 100%"

>AND THEN SAY I'VE FAILED CAPTCHA?

 

Some of the captcha fonts are basically a trap. I hit failures on those captchas at a rate 10x higher than the "good" fonts, even when the text appears to be clearly readable.

 

I avoid the font that looks like a digital clock display - some of the letters are really hard to discern and get right. I also avoid the font that looks a little bit like cursive. There are a few letters in this font that I have never, ever successfully solved a captcha when they are present.

 

Click the captcha until you get an easy, unmistakable one where the letters are not obfuscated into being ambiguous.

 

See the attached advice to help improve your captcha success rate.

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 1:42 p.m. No.6696188   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6218 >>6525

>>6696133

 

Hubert Cumberdale doesn't make a very believable Dr. Strange, to me. And what the fuck is this with his origin story being that he crashed his lambourghini into another person while overtaking recklessly on a darkened mountain road while reading text messages at the same time? Is he a fucking idiot? How did he live long enough to reach his current age? What happened to the guy he smashed into while being an absolute fucking dullard?

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 1:45 p.m. No.6696211   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6229 >>6232 >>6276 >>6302 >>6513

>>6696172

>The key isn't choosing a captcha you can solve, but choosing a captcha that captcha can solve. For a few of the fonts, pic related, 60% of the time, they work all the time.

 

Ur bakin' mah noodle, fren. Gimme some insight on how this thing works–is it a consensus-driven thing like the half-chan captchas? Does the machine scan and read the text and then compare against what you typed and tell you if you're right or wrong?

 

Are we all teaching AI how to read text by solving these things all the time? (we are)

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 1:48 p.m. No.6696243   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6696190

>possible cancer . . . from the blackened char

 

Correct. Combustion and partial combustion products can often include carcinogens like toluene and benzene, as various organic molecules are partially destroyed by heat. Denatured proteins can (very rarely) take on forms that are still biologically active, but do not do what the originally did. Cancer is all a dice roll. The wrong molecule in the wrong place at the wrong time can have long-term repercussions, or not.

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 1:53 p.m. No.6696283   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6696235

 

Phytoestrogens (which are signaling molecules used in plant physiology) bind to the Human body's natural estrogen receptors, but do not carry out the functions that normal Human estrogens do. The body recognizes that the chemical effects of its normal estrogen are not taking place, and assumes that its natural estrogen has gone missing. In response, it increases the level of production of natural estrogens. Later, when you stop intaking phytoestrogens, your body's estrogen levels are still high, and you are affected by an endocrine hormone imbalance.

 

This is very similar to why you'll get a "caffeine headache" if you stop intaking caffeine after having lots for a long time; levels of a hormone in your brain that dilate blood vessels are affected by caffeine the same way that natural estrogen is affected by phytoestrogen. When you stop consuming the caffeine that interferes with these hormones, the levels of these hormones and their resulting activity is much too high. Over-dilated blood vessels can result in increased pressure which you experience as a headache. On top of that, caffeine is a diuretic, and being dehydrated can also lead to head pain.

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 2:01 p.m. No.6696344   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6364

>>6696259

>now he is on board?

 

They can smell the smoke, and where there's smoke, there's fire. And fire? It rises. And as it rises, it burns up the people at the bottom of the totem pole first.

 

Look for the rats to jump ship from the lowest decks first. And don't feel bad about letting loose a great, big, guttural belly laugh when you see it.

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 2:07 p.m. No.6696389   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6401 >>6426

>>6696330

>NSA Whistleblowers have proof that DNC leak was NOT result of a hack

 

Yeah. We've all known since 2016 that the metadata on the leak shows it was transferred at a rate of 22 megabytes per second, which matches up with transfer onto a USB 2.0 flash drive, and a rate impossible for foreign actors to achieve via the internet.

 

In addition, the "Guccifer 2.0" leaks had Russian fingerprints very clumsily tacked onto them to intentionally make it look like they came from a Russian source–but the guy who did the work forgot to remove the metadata stamp added by his copy of MS Office. He was a DNC IT staffer.

 

Seth Rich made the first leak, the DNC made the 2nd leak in an attempt to make it appear that both leaks were from Russian hackers. But they fucked it all up and when they murdered Seth, they might as well have screamed "HEY EVERYONE, LOOK HERE, WE WHACKED THE PANDA BECAUSE HE DID SOME SHIT TO US"

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 2:09 p.m. No.6696397   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6696388

>It is my understanding that when a body is discovered decomposing…it is dead and not in hiding…

 

Yes, of course. And not trying to be sarcastic or impolite, but none of us saw any of those bodies. If the White Hats needed to disappear someone into WitPro or protective custody without tipping off the enemy, they might easily orchestrate the news stories in this fashion so outsiders are convinced the individual is dead.

 

Not saying that's what happened, or even very likely. But I hope that's the case for the retiring NYPD Chief that had worked on the Weiner laptop.

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 2:13 p.m. No.6696428   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>6696370

>Your shit has no affect on me.

 

Okay first, it's "effect" in this context. Sorry for grammar nazi'ing, but I must be that which I am.

 

Second, what the heck are you talking about? I thought you were giving me a compliment for figuring something out for myself? I posted the Pepe holding his cheeks because I was happy I got a gold star. Are you saying you were actually giving me shit?

 

Fuck, man. Guess I'm not as smart as I thought!

Anonymous ID: cef3c0 June 7, 2019, 2:18 p.m. No.6696484   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6505

>>6696420

 

I don't think you're a shill. I get where you're coming from. Can you blame people for wanting to believe? If what you say is correct and none of this is some kind of strategy or has a double meaning, everyone is fucking fucked as hard as possible. So what's the point of looking down that road? I prefer to keep my hope and examine other possibilities than "Trump is the Omega Kike and this is all a song and dance meant to keep us in line and prevent us from revolting while they finish us off."

 

Surely you can understand that, right?