Q: WHAT IS A KEYSTONE? FIND THE KE[Y]STONE.

Re-reading the crumbs and searching through old threads it appears we have neither answered Q's question (What is a keystone?) nor found the keystone itself. So, I'm bringing it up for discussion again.

Here are some things we know:

(1) The word "keystone" appears in the following GitHub (qanonposts.com) messages : 128, 133, 140, 167, 251, 262, 270.

(2) There are several variations on the phrasing:

>What is a keystone?

GitHub 128. This is the fist instance of the word "keystone." It is the only time Q asks "What is a keystone?" (emphasis on the article "a").

>Find the ke[y]stone.

GitHub 128. This instance of the word appears in the same message as the first instance. Notice the "y" in brackets. It is the final letter of a message embedded within GitHub 128 that reads, "CIA is here pray." The letter "y" will become significant later.

>What is the keystone?

This exact question appears for the first time in GitHub 133. It appears again twice in GitHub 140, then once in 167.

>Find the keystone.

This phrase first appears in GitHub 128 with brackets around the "y". It is then repeated in GitHub 251 and 262 without the brackets around the "y".

>Apply the Keystone.

GitHub 270. This instance of the word "keystone" is the last we see. The phrase in which it is embedded is the only instance of the phrase "Apply the Keystone." Notice that the word "Keystone" is capitalized.

There's an evolution in this sequence of messages. First Q posits "what is" and "find the" keystone together; then Q asks "What is the keystone" four different times in four different contexts; then Q instructs "Find the keystone" in two different contexts; finally Q instructs, "Apply the Keystone" (with a capital "K").

(3) Two definitions of the word "keystone" are important to us:

>Per dictionary.com:

A keystone is the wedge-shaped piece at the summit of an arch, regarded as holding the other pieces in place.

>Per U.S. government regulations for the classification of sensitive information:

A keystone is that portion of a sensitive document that requires the entire document to be classified.

NOTE: I am indebted to another Anon for this insight. Search for "keystone principle of classification" at the following link for details:

https:// fas.org/sgp/library/quist2/chap_10.html

(4) There are three Q messages which clarify the puzzle to be solved (but don't solve it):

>Dec 05 2017 16:01:30 Q !ITPb.qbhqo 38467

>GitHub 269

Key - unlocks the door of all doors (info)

Stone - the force / strength capable of yielding power to act on info

Key+Stone=

Q

NOTE that "yielding" in the above should be "wielding." Q highlighted the letter "y" in a previous post.

>Dec 05 2017 16:06:17 Q !ITPb.qbhqo 38507

>GitHub 270

Adm R/ No Such Agency (W&W) + POTUS/USMIL =

Apply the Keystone.

Paint the picture.

Q

>Dec 05 2017 16:05:45 Anonymous 38503

>GitHub 271

>>38467

Military Intelligence, No Such Agency = key

POTUS and Patriots = stone

NOTE: This was an Anon post which Q confirmed by citing it by post number without comment.

——————————–

All the above look like the basic outline of the puzzle to me. We haven't solved it yet. A proper solution would complete the equation in a way that normies could easily understand:

Key+Stone=

It would also explain:

• Who unlocked the door of all doors? (GitHub 157)

• POTUS opened the door of all doors. (GitHub 167: What does this mean?)

>>669692

Here's my guess on the equation:

Key + Stone = Control of Society

This control can be good (meaning the arch of knowledge plus force sustains a beneficial union of interests), or this control can be bad/evil (meaning the arch of knowledge plus force sustains a society of enslavement).

This interpretation, however, is purely theoretical and non-practical. It also doesn't explain much in terms of the other elements:

• Who unlocked the door of all doors? (GitHub 157)

• POTUS opened the door of all doors. (GitHub 167: What does this mean?)

C'mon, Anons, let's figure this out, Or, if you already have figured it out, please share what you know!

Keep in mind, the explanation has to be something we can easily explain to others. The explanation must be practical and common-sensical. Otherwise, it is not an explanation at all.

>>669703

>Is this Q confirming keystone?

I don't think so. If you plug the terms into the equation you still get no answer. To illustrate:

Military Intelligence, No Such Agency + POTUS and Patriots =

Well, what do these things added together actually equal?

See what I mean? We haven't figured out the puzzle yet. Any ideas?

>>669821

>POTUS opened the door of all doors by WINNING the PRESIDENCY.

That's a great insight. Thank you for sharing it!

When Q says the "Key - unlocks the door of all doors (info)," maybe what he means is POTUS knows everything there is to know about all of us?

How would you put it?

>>669852

>the keystone is a communications infrastructure that cannot be censored or compromised

I'm thinking something similar. Something along the lines of the idea that every device connected to the Internet is a surveillance tool to some extent.

That is to say, every device could be EITHER a surveillance tool or a freedom tool. It's up to us to make one or the other true.

>>669939

>Q already told us the keystone is:

>Military Intelligence, No Such Agency = key

>POTUS and Patriots = stone

Q also gave us the equation:

Key + Stone =

Your terms apply only on the left of the equals sign. What goes to the right?

The answer has to be something simple and straightforward that normies (and Anons!) can easily understand.

>>669858

>Just a thought…Jesus said "I am the Door".

I'm with you, but we need more than religion here. Whatever it is that we're missing will (in my not so humble opinion) be wholly consistent with Jesus's teaching, but it has to stand on its own to reach the audience Q is trying to reach.

At least it seems so to me, my friend…

>>670010

>Xkeyscore and NSA data collection is the key

I think there is much in what you say. How can we explain it to non-techies? Where are the specific Q statements we can connect it to?

I'm not a techie myself, but I think there's a connection here with Apache Software Foundation (ASF) and SecureDrop and other things Q has mentioned. The insiders to the expansion of the World Wide Web since 1992 know something the rest of us don't…

I wish I knew more about the technology so that I could expand my thinking here…

>>670000

>Double meantings

Double meanings don't help people who don't see them. If you can explain, please do. Otherwise, you're not helpful.