>>6696066 (lb)
Understand anon. We're in the same liddle life-raft. That said, I agree with the other anon. A LOT has been done, and against unimaginable odds.
Keep the faith. They built this hell over thousands of years……….can you REALLY expect to clean it up in one Presidential term? And half at that?
"Patience," saith the Lord (at least I'm guessing he said it). Uhm, let's try 'Rome wasn't built in a day!'
The best I can tell you is I believe in your sincerity. I get frustrated daily.
Keep in mind though you do NOT have all the facts. Very few people do. You're reacting to the public displays, some of which, by definition, are orchestrated to obfuscate the other side's understanding. We don't telegraph our punches!
Have faith that there is an army of people on the inside working towards what you would like to see on the outside. The task is immense. Most people are still too brainwashed to accept what's coming. Step back for a while and put some distance between you and all this stuff AND come back later. I'll wager you will find it helpful.
>Director Of The Council For The National Interest
Odd. Same name of the urologist I saw today. Don't get me wrong, she was head of the department.
I understand that moo joos have destroyed this place. That I spent close to two years, unpaid, offering digs and trying to help only to watch it turn to shit.
I understand that there's a
DEDICATED JQ THREAD, IF NOT MULTIPLE!
but brennan's butt-boys are still at it. slinging jew hatred like they sling their feces at each other when left to their own devices.
Riddle me this. Was I responding to YOUR POST? Or was that another misfire?
FUCK YOU!
Brother anon. I am as angry as you are. But we MUST temper grouping Muslims together the same way they group Jews.
When you can identify culpable individuals, by all means, educate the board as to who, and what (you can prove) they did.
Otherwise, we run the risk of becoming moo joos ourselves.
>or possessing
LawAnon. As to the 'Mens Rea' I wouldn't be so quick (unless you can back it up with a fed/appropriate state statute) that the standard is 'Knowingly' - as it pertains to 'possession.'
Think 'strict liability' might come into play more than you're allowing for. Those international traveler "now arriving" stories never seem to go into the 'admission during interrogation' part. Shoddy reporting? Perhaps, but it does seem like they leave that out all the time.
Even if true:
Now we would have a whopping ONE death attributed to THC
Holy shit……………it's almost as rampant as the plague! Stop the press!!!
>ALL crimes require mens rea
Yes, but the standard OF the mens rea component differs depending upon what crime/offense you're talking about.
Murder - "Knowingly taking another life (to paraphrase)
Product Liability (standard for mens rea is 'strict liability', knowledge not necessary to prove - pic related).
As they say………………..it depends upon what offense is being charged.
Anon, you replied to me here:
>>6696247 (lb)
And three sentences later said you were muh concerned by my post here:
>>6696422 (lb)
Only trouble is
I DIDN'T POST THE SECOND POST!
A simple look at user id would show as much. Put down the rum. You've obviously had too much. It's turned you into a liberal from the lunatic left……namely, calling people the exact thing you're guilty of!
"constantly knee-jerk…even when you haven't said anything". For crying out loud!