>Can a corrupt FBI agent get a warrant to trace back the identities of any anon who saw those images?
Both state and federal case law say that merely viewing child pornography is not possession. See, for example, Tecklenburg v. Appellate Div. of Superior Court (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1402, 1416-1419.
www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-accidentally-looking-at-child-pornography-onlin-463285.html
For the porn shills:
Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child pornography with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.
www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography
>does a shill want filter or reply
POTUS Tweets
10:43 am PDT
2:43 pm PDT
twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1137112921991983105
Flying with the best escort in the skies!
twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1137117028366528513
Some people will only dream about #success. The professional #Soldier works hard for it.
twitter.com/USArmy/status/1137118350281183234