Pretty sure that 2 of those IDs say NOT notable
No worries just clarifying
Don't care if it's in notables or not. If it was nominated twice then I see no prob with baker including it. Watched it and he gives no source for his claims except some guy he worked with 20 years ago told him something. Maybe if you found an article corroborating his claims I would nominate it. But that would require you to dig and think.
Who cares? Dumber stuff and unsourced stuff have been in notables. If it keeps it from being spammed every bread and it hurts your vagina then I say put it in