>>6697305

>How do you go back into shill posting immediately. This isn't a chat room. Why are you ignoring shill baker and sliding the bread?

See this line from the very same post you just replied to:

>Far from perfect but working on it.

I'm not sure what I am supposed to do about "shill baker." I see someone calling the baker a shill in almost every bread I read. I usually don't even understand what that baker is being called out for. Person A thinks something is notable, Person B screams that it's not and calls the baker a shill. If baker capitulates to B, A calls him a shill. Looks to me like there's no way to win.

What did you post that the baker isn't taking seriously? What do you do about it when that happens? If it's not working when you do it, what exactly am I supposed to do? You clearly have more experience with this shit.

>JESUS CHRIST YOU FUCKING SHILL RETARD ASKING ME FOR HELP. FUCK YOU PRAYING ON MY KINDNESS YOU EVIL SACK OF SHIT.

Some deep breaths might be a good idea, man. You are strung the fuck out by the shit that's frustrating you. Sorry that I was a part of that. But there's a limit to what you can accomplish talking to people this way. And when you talk about your "kindness," I can't help but choke on my water a little bit. I don't have to respond to you at all, but I'm trying to take you seriously here. Try to be worthy of that effort on my part. You can't shit your pants over every single post anyone makes that you don't think is worthy–because your response to that post was of equally little value, and you are also doing bad things to your blood pressure.

You could stand to be better as well.

I won't be shitting up this bread, so you can calm the fuck down.

>>6697359

>The [Q]uestion I have for you is this: What's you're point? Did I hit a nerve? Why are you saving, er tracking, my posts to begin with?

>What exactly did I say or do that has your panties all up in a bunch. Confused? The more so as I take ZERO efforts to hide who I am or what I post.

…No. I simply don't understand what the fuck you were talking about. I posted a Pepe and you came back with all this shit (pic related) when about a minute earlier you were thanking me for making some good post about captchas. I screenshotted those 3 posts from the previous bread AFTER you replied with all that "you're a crazy liberal, I didn't even make that post" shit.

Do you care to explain what you were talking about? Was that an accidental reply, or did my pepe actually trigger you into saying all that shit? If so, you are a fuckin' conundrum to me. And that other guy is probably going to scream at me again for replying to you, too. Fuckin' great.

>>6697408

>One last time. Watch the vide in this link: >>6697351

Damn, wow. Did that man just stand on a fucking podium and name the Jew in full view of the media?

BAKER NOTABLE

>>6697351 Former CIA Officer Outlines Israeli Attacks Against the USA

I don't care if Baker agrees, anons, this video is worth watching.

>>6697462

>If I misunderstood it, I apologize. It came across as mocking, which is almost the norm here. The next post was another Pepe, only it seemed to confirm my interpretation.

>Again, if I was off……….I apologize. I truly appreciate any fren I have. I'm sorry.

It's alright, man. It was not meant to be a mockery. I didn't want to spend a long time looking for a specific Pepe so I grabbed the first one in my image folder that looked like Pepe going "Oooh, nice!"

By way of reconciliation, may I encourage you to watch this video?

>>6697351 Former CIA Officer Outlines Israeli Attacks Against the USA

>>6697479

Here you go. One of my favorites.

>>6697547

>thank you, patriot.

To you as well.

>>6697541

>Pretty sure that 2 of those IDs say NOT notable

But… the video is most certainly notable. How could ANY QResearcher claim otherwise? That video is notable as all fucking get-out. This former spook is at a press conference naming the Jew to a whole room full of people and gives specific examples of how Israel bends us over a fucking barrel.

>>6697631

>the "moderates" are liars

Correct. See pic related. Oh, sure, a lot of U.S. Muslims are the equivalent of normies who don't give a fuck one way or the other and don't really follow Islamic law in much of anything. I've known some who were the descendants of people that fled from Iran when the islamist revolution began, and their parents educated them about what it's like living in a Sharia country. But in a theocracy like Iran, or a country that lies about being a secular state like Turkey, best believe that when you get stoned to death, those "moderate" muslims will be there.

>>6697694

>Don't care if it's in notables or not. If it was nominated twice then I see no prob with baker including it. Watched it and he gives no source for his claims except some guy he worked with 20 years ago told him something. Maybe if you found an article corroborating his claims I would nominate it. But that would require you to dig and think.

A lot of the claims he makes are about things that are common knowledge, such as the enormous number of U.S. politicians with dual citizenship in Israel who march in lockstep behind causes that benefit Israel and not the U.S., for example. Some of the things he's talking about probably can't be sourced precisely because of Jewish collective power. I dunno, I think it's a great video.