Are you the anon that was trying to get my help getting the ex-CIA guy video into notables?
Bakers are utterly ignoring it, and one random nobody keeps saying "oyyyy vey, goyim, that guy works for CAIR and HAMAS, dat's not a notable, ya schlamiel!" whilst typing with his nose. Guess it's JIDF baking tonight.
>Noted by the OP and one other.
It was noted by me when I REPOSTED it from a previous bread, and another anon, and by 4-5 anons in other breads. I am not the OP of that video, therefore my nomination counts as one of the two required–and that's irrelevant, since it got numerous nominations in previous breads any damn way. Please do pay attention.
>And obvoiusly you shills are triggered bc of my takes on the POTUS Ingraham interview.
>Which point is making you butthurt so much?
Sorry, I haven't seen whatever video you're talking about, and I don't know what you're talking about. I was trying to find an anon I was talking to in a previous bread. If you're not him, then we have nothing to talk about. Enjoy your paranoia without my help.
If you want me to watch your video or whatever you are talking about, post it in a reply and I'll take a look.
>Could you glow moar? I’m the “random nobody”. Who the fuck are you, random shill. Yes, cair and hamas are associated with that POS group. Which means iran is associated with that group. FFS, they endorsed Ralph Nader and support people who are in prison for terrorism. Now take your whilst and mate bullshit to the UK or jq thread. Bunch of iranian cucks you are.
I'm a random nobody, just like you. I have yet to see you post a source for that guy being a CAIR\HAMAS plant, and that doesn't make any sense anyway, since CAIR and HAMAS are both creations of Israel too. Seems like they'd be shooting themselves in the foot to have him go on the mic and say all that shit especially given that the shit he says is true.
Also it's kinda turdy to make fun of me for using whilst, it's a great word. Not British FWIW. I only glow when I get out of the shower.
Do you care to explain your problems with Ralph Nader? He seems to run for president all the fucking time and gets nowhere, ever, and his political career predates my interest in politics. Explain why this group supported him, to the best of your understanding, and why you think that's a bad thing.
Orrrrr you could just keep spewing the same ignorant "duhhh you glow, ur a shill, go post in different threads" bullshit without supporting your position on anything. I maintain that the video is notable BECAUSE someone actually got on a podium and called out Israel as a garbage ally (which they are) and made many truthful statements about them.
If you do not engage on these points, you are full of shit and that'll be the end of our talk.
>A silver bullet through the heart kills the JIDF shills.
That's werewolves, bruh. For JIDF\MOS shills you kill them by attacking their credit rating.
>Don't forget Killary.
She may have a lower bodycount (MAYBE), but she's definitely more evil, narcissistic, egotistical, maniacal, violent, crooked, and nasty.
Plus she smells like boiled cabbage farts and rotting clam meat.
>“She’s Pretty”
There was one guy that said it for Nasim and one that said it for Huma. Or maybe they were the same guy?
Once a guy is already burning that badly, you arent doing him any favors by putting him out, kek. Not even the Chinese black market for organs can provide enough skin grafts to save you from a hideously painful death.
>I hope they run him. That would be one of the few things they could do to guarantee no "minority" vote. Because that nigga gay.
They've spent so much political capital attacking white men and saying white men are the problem, I don't envision them putting a white man forward as their candidate for President. Buttgieg? Biden? Not a fucking chance of winning as Democrats, they've trained their people too hard to blame whitey for everything.
>If they throw a woman on there it might get some traction. But all the women are shrieking hags so…
>What if Michelle runs?
That's what I assume they'll do, only they'll announce her candidacy very late in the primary. They'll say (without actually saying) that voting for her is the way to get a 3rd term Obama presidency. It could work for them, but for some reason I think they might run into unforeseen problems. Knowing what we know about their goals, it's probably their most logical and likely move on the surface. But we know so much else goes on beneath the surface with these people (especially on Epstein Island)
>Newbies, learn to filter
>shills hate filter
No they don't. When you filter them, they can say whatever they want without any opposition from you. It leaves them free to construct the narrative without any pesky interference.
Is it necessary to filter? Shutting your eyes doesn't make the demons go away.
>Police forces lose officers regularly because someone HAS to look at the evidence.
Aye, like the NYPD officers that looked in Weiner's laptop and ended up going on psychiatric leave. I can only imagine what CSIs go through when they have to walk into a room where 5+ people died violently several weeks ago and have already putrefied. They have to see dead children, people that have been tortured to death, and probably worse shit we can't even imagine. Even QResearchers are normies by comparison to them.
I totally understand how the things they\we know about could put a lot of TRUE normies in the looney bin. But what I really worry about is that Q is hinting at even darker shit; the real existence of demons, EBEs, or whatever supernatural evil shit may or may not exist.
>bad strategy
>'be careful who you follow'
I don't understand. I'm not saying I never filter (Finkelstein and his clones, every bread, Tiresias sometimes, scat and gore posters) but do you really think the best way to handle shills is to filter them? You can avoid replying to them without filtering, if your goal is not to give them (you)s, right?
>Obama's secret pardons that would cover all work done while in office ie Clinton.
Yeah, those worry me. They would have had to know they were in serious trouble when Trump won, and obama had a little over 2 months to scorch the Earth on his way out the door. It's plausible that he made enough secret pardons and executive orders to render the OIG, DOJ, FBI, etc. completely dickless and unable to prosecute him or any of his allies for anything. It's bad enough that the Senior Executive Service are all completely immune to being fired–how the fuck is that legal and why can't Trump change it? I kind of wish some benevolent ETs would show up and murder all the pedovores with particle cannons, but I guess that's asking too much from a race that's only interested in exploring the vastness of the rectums of midwestern farmers.