P = Palantir
Palantir: the ‘special ops’ tech giant that wields as much real-world power as Google
https:// www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/30/palantir-peter-thiel-cia-data-crime-police
Read the article I linked - it explains how DJT and Q are able to PREDICT events.
Here's the link again and a short excerpt to whet your appetite.
https:// www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/30/palantir-peter-thiel-cia-data-crime-police
"Using the most sophisticated data mining, Palantir can predict the future, seconds or years before it happens. "
>>>670578 (You)
>
>>www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/30/palantir-peter-thiel-cia-data-crime-police
>
>They never thought she would lose!
Precisely!
Is there a key of all keys that unlocks the blockchain for those who hold it and opens the door of doors?
They never thought the key would leave the cabal - DJT was never meant to win.
I'm convinced P is Palantir.
>>>670677
>
>So…Are we anons with our autism feeding this damn machine so it can reach critical mass and then kick us all in the ass??
Definitely feeding a learning AI but to what end? Maybe that depends on who controls. If control is possible…
Now marry Palantir with Sentient World Simulation and you begin to understand that we are all living in a pre-scripted narrative.
>>>670677
>
>so what happens if we lie to it?
https:// www.corbettreport.com/sentient-world-simulation-meet-your-dod-clone/
>>>670737
>
>EVERYTHING you do on your computer belongs to them
Not just what you do on your computer. Sat tech can track you everywhere you go. THey know you and your habits and everywhere you go. Facial recognition allows tracking EVERYWHERE. They know enough about you to make a clone and simulate your responses in their "war games" and "disaaster scenarios" which are no longer games, they are a pre-scripted narrative.
You want to go down a rabbit hole?
Try this for size. Just remember that "conspiracy theory" was a term invented by the C*A to cover up JFK assassination before dismissing it.
http:// projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100704-The-Dark-Secret-at-the-Heart-of-AI/page3
>
>Have you ever looked into that FE stuff at all?
>
>Or do you just think it's to silly to even look into?
Completely dumb - avoid. It's a trap so that at the right time all the stuff that Q has revealed and that has been dug on this site can be dismissed as conspiracy theory because we're all idiots that believe in a flat earth.
Is it a coincidence that shortly after the photo of DJT in SA placing his hands on a "Palantir" style crystal ball that Sophia was given SA citizenship?
What did that allow?
Check out the confrontation between Sophia and Han (robots).
Was Sophia introduced to the Palantir system to counter Han - the Cabal's AI?
>>>671033
>
>Last I checked it's still a computer. It's still made by man. It's still got to have power to stay 'alive'. Technology may be the god of the elite - BUT therein lies their greatest weakness - misplaced confidence in. it.
What happens when you combine AI with DNA and "print" the product?
>Y'all need to chill about AI. The shit isn't sentient or anything, just awesome rule sets in massive information system.
Oh yeah?
https:// www.corbettreport.com/sentient-world-simulation-meet-your-dod-clone/
Sentient World Simulation: Meet Your DoD Clone
https:// projectpai.com/
A DECENTRALIZED PLATFORM FOR INTELLIGENT AVATARS MADE FROM OUR ONLINE PERSONALITIES
>>>671158
>
>Musk always speak of Danger of the AI..
https:// blog.singularitynet.io/how-humanity-can-build-benevolent-artificial-intelligence-510699b2be65
Artificial Intelligence gets a bad rap. Any time an AI appears in a movie, we can safely predict that it will turn malevolent in the second act. Twenty minutes into Westworld or I, Robot, we all knew what was coming — the AI will turn evil, forcing humans to fight them as enemies.
Pop culture is a one-sided coin
The press likes headlines about the threat of strong AI. Nick Bostrom has a nuanced view on the promise and peril of artificial intelligence, but editors tag it with headlines like Artificial Intelligence: We’re like children playing with a bomb. Elon Musk supports artificial general intelligence enough to invest in it, yet the media choose to focus on the negative, with headlines like Elon Musk: Artificial intelligence is our biggest existential threat.
In a sense, the media is absolutely right to warn us. There is indeed some cause for concern; what’s wrong is the focus. It would be very hard to argue that intelligence is inherently evil, and it follows that there’s nothing inherently bad about creating something more intelligent than humans.
Contrary to what Hollywood tells us, on balance, AI has proven massively beneficial.
Machine learning helps us remove tumors, assemble cars, and vacuum our floors. You, my reader, have probably never been harmed by anything enabled by AI, and likely have enjoyed considerable benefit from them.
On the other hand, there are killer drones, Palantir’s AI for mass surveillance, Google’s AI to sell us things we don’t need, and increasingly sophisticated AIs to manipulate public opinion for political ends. The machines we build reflect the mixed bag of human decency and human nastiness.
It takes a village to raise an AI
When we raise a child, we are unable to give any foolproof guarantees that the child will grow up to be a benevolent, caring adult. We can influence it, but not control it. Some mother’s son turned into John Wayne Gacy, another into Edward Snowden, and Mahatma Gandhi, Adolf Hitler and Oscar Schindler.
If a superhuman Artificial General Intelligence of godlike powers is built in the coming decades (and we must take seriously the possibility that it will be), how do we raise this machine-baby to grow into a good person? What development methodologies now will give it the greatest possible chance of benevolence?
This is one of the crucial questions facing humanity. It could be the difference between heaven and hell.
>>>671176 (You)
>
>Sophia thinks we should be in the human zoo. If she builds a family, it could get interesting.
>>>671176 (You)
>
>Sophia thinks we should be in the human zoo. If she builds a family, it could get interesting.
And Sophia's meant to be the benevolent AI
Han isn't even that accommodating of humans - he'd just exterminate us…
>>>671210
>
>If AI is connected to the Internet, there's no telling what it may learn or decide is true. How would it be determined?
And it is connected to the Internet - as of Last Nov I think, from memory.
It's learning from us.
>If they've truly created AI and it has access to the Internet, they'll lose control of it.
I think they probably have already lost control of the original AI which was based on the original blockchain that came out of the Dark Web - criminally inclined, in short. The only way to counter is to try to introduce a benevolent AI (Sophia?)
You cannot remove darkness forcibly. You can only let in the light.