>We know who the real beast is
He who keeps others awake at night.. While ''he'' sleeps.. Mattis is fine in my book :)
>We know who the real beast is
He who keeps others awake at night.. While ''he'' sleeps.. Mattis is fine in my book :)
Yeah, I actually modified my q.js to have idiot fading switched off by default.. I just want to see highlighted q posts and my (you)s with the script⦠It's more fun to watch the rest go by anyway.. Tons of clowns to troll and nubs to school
These findings concerning the clowns, the bots, and their ways are being posted more for new visitors, so they don't get suckered into wasting their time. Hardened anons ''should already know all this shit.''
How to Spot a Clown:
β Attempting to get a divisive or emotional knee-jerk trigger response from (you) to derail research is a red flag.
β Concern trolling and copy/pasta spam shilling that contradicts confirmed findings is another red flag.
β Using faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causality, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc. are all yet another red flag.
β Employing social ethics that are disingenuous, such as doxxing anyone, "reverse psychology" ploys or ones based on lying to the American People; These are obvious red flags.
β Promoting tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the Law are huge red flags.
β Using Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt tactics for any reason is highly suspicious.
This is just a subset of the disinformation tactics employed. A complete write-up is available here: https:// vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/
How to spot a Clown's bot
β NEVER KNOWINGLY ENGAGE A CLOWN OR BOT DIRECTLY. It just wastes bread with their responses, and hands them a target to lock on to. If you suspect a clown or bot is trying to engage (you), the countermeasures will force the wrangler to earn it, which usually outs them; They are lazy.
β It seems that the easiest way to get a bot wrangler to give their (you) to you is to fuck with the bots by proxy, either by copy/pasting the user's ID as a quoted reference instead of tagging its actual post link in your response, or by answering it with text in an image (or both) until they start fucking up because they can't lock onto a target phrase correctly.. Doing this can also make the bots look artificially erratic, and easier for other anons to spot. It also makes it so the wranglers HAVE TO engage.
What we know about the cl0wnbots
β Require a handler to watch for, target, and be in the thread
β Can not enter threads themselves
β Can pick up random or contradictory meme flags
β Consist of multiple bots that respond to posts and each other, and can create posts
β Appear to activate on lists of trigger words; these can change over time
β Use a combination of legit pasta, pre-written points, or spam targeted at sliding the thread
β Have unwittingly pasta'd supportive posts
β Are employed mostly at night and on weekends (US time)
β Add to bump limits
β Can be filtered by ID once they are observed
β Are not perfected and can be easily spotted
β Were tested briefly prior to being deployed starting on the /CBTS/ boards
β Have certain flaws that can cause them to misfire in sometimes comical ways
β The handlers can make bogus clown threads, but also can be confused by accidental ones
β Handlers, as of now, cannot access the servers
β Have still not succeeded in their mission
β Still can't meme
β Still can't meme
I did not make any claims about who wrote the code prior to right now, so whatever⦠As far as it being malicious⦠Read it for yourself. The code ''is'' the proof of that ;) It's not like it's compiled or anything.
I personally think the script's idiot fader is gay, but the rest of the stuff the script does is pretty cool.
I just edited the js to default to having fading being off. I don't feel like turning it off every time I look at a bread in a fresh browser.
>The script is safe today, but unless we can continuously audit it(we can't) we're only setting ourselves up for failure by promoting arbitrary code execution to users that don't understand what it is or why it might be a problem.
Baker
This is why I do not think the q.js should be in the bread.
Just saying.