Flynn's team gets a lot of extensions, it seems.
Feels like a delay tactic, and its a good one. Nobody seems to be pushing back on it.
I was looking at that too, though she made MG in 2017 under the Trump Administration. Her promotion to BG in 2014 is notable though. During the Obama administration there was some house cleaning going on with General staff, and your chances of getting up there without notice was pretty low.
I wonder what the IG investigations are about. Just misconduct or inappropriate relationships? I haven't seen anything on it.
Just speculation, but a lot of the dirt that Q and Q+ have on the candidates will likely be used to thin the playing field, or at the very least smash the opponent. I don't want to underestimate the enemy (Deep State) however, but it seems like the Trump team is holding onto their good cards until then.
My theory is that after the elections things will happen quickly, and the 3-4 years of Trump's next term will be stabilizing and wrapping up the "waking people up" thing.
Just my theory, no real evidence.
Good find, and thanks for quenching my curiosity!
Yeah, and the wait is absolutely painful haha. I think, though, all things considered - if they started doing everything now, with the media still being as influential as they are and a large portion of the population still disgruntled at the idea of Trump, the backlash would probably end up in the elections going the wrong way. I think the timing has to be just perfect, and until then the name of the game is waking up more people, letting the deep state fall into their own traps (as evidenced by CNN's death spiral in ratings), and steadily eat away at the Deep State's organization(s).
So I'm not TOO concerned, but I'm just as impatient as everyone else haha
Not that I disagree, but to play devil's advocate and give some credit to the finer sex, I've had some fairly good female officers. The ones that do excel generally tend to act more like men anyhow, but not in the Hollywood-style ultra-she-man/bitch style.
Though, to counter myself even further, it really comes down to how officers embody leadership. Male or female, if they don't have a natural or learned grasp of the art and science of leadership they end up failing miserably.
Yeah I feel you. I signed up for this shit back in 2017 as well, but only recently really became more active on the chans. So I guess my burnout will be slower.
But, either way, welcome back! I feel like this down period might actually be good. It's drawing out the more patient anons, and the one's who need constant stimulation are dormant. Not that we don't need them, because they ARE vital, but those who are here now are the ones that'll last long term.
That's the composition/division logical fallacy. I don't mean to hammer on your idea here because I generally agree that in most instances, and statistically, men make better leaders than women; but the world can't be viewed so black-and-white.
Yeah, I'm definitely guilty of that. I'm no saint of patience, myself, but I've been learning it more and more.