Anonymous ID: f314b5 March 15, 2018, 9:29 a.m. No.673795   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anons,

 

One of your main missions is to avoid giving ( yous ) to shills. It is up to you to determine who is

and who is not a shill. I have my own guidelines, which I will post below; however,

this does not in any way encumber you with the requirement to follow them. In fact, I rarely

filter anyone, unless they do multiple posts that force me to scrollscrollscroll endlessly to get past their horrible formatting.

 

  1. Most shills do not post on topic. If a post does not relate to anything that has come before

and it seems like bullshit. It is probably a shill. Do not give it a ( you ). The corollary to this is

someone who posts an apparently genuine inquiry. These you may answer at your discretion;

but be aware you may be feeding a ( you ) to a shill.

 

  1. Look at the number of posts an anon has made. If the number is greater than 10% of the

entire bread to that point, then it is probably a shill. If it is a single digit, then it is likely not a shill

depending on how many total posts there are in the bread to that point.

 

  1. Look for repetition in posts, unoriginal content, or merely agreeing with another poster.

Most shills have no imagination, so they repeat, copy, or just say, "yeah, that." If you see

someone who follows this or similar patterns, do not grace them with a ( you ).

 

  1. Completely off topic. This applies to the reptillards, the flat earthers, and many other

similar shills. You are allowed to give these probable shills ONE ( you ) to ask if there is a

Q post that relates. Any answer that is not a quoted and applicable Q post means you have

given up an unwarranted ( you ).

 

  1. Advice fags… similar to THIS post. Perhaps I am a shill. I am posting something

that doesn't directly relate. You might want to consider answering this post instead of just

reading it and taking from it what might improve your contribution to this bread.

 

  1. Facecuck type posts. If someone posts something that probably would look better on a

social media platform, that anon may not be a shill, but he still does not deserve a ( you ).

 

In short, respond only when the original post is responsible, and your response ADDS

something to the conversation. This public service announcement has been brought to you

by the letter Q, and our sponsors.

 

I hope I got the formatting right. Any errors have my prior apologies.

Anonymous ID: f314b5 March 15, 2018, 9:54 a.m. No.674036   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RomanSnopes said "The one god theory is FALSE."

 

Who do you want to censor your raw information? #InternetBillOfRights

Anonymous ID: f314b5 March 15, 2018, 9:58 a.m. No.674080   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4126

>>674063

Sorry, bud, but until it is proven and becomes a Law, it is still open to doubt. Please do not

postulate theory as fact, because you are demonstrably wrong. Global warming is a theory.

I seriously doubt it is man-made. This makes me PRO-science, not anti-science.

Anonymous ID: f314b5 March 15, 2018, 10:05 a.m. No.674156   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4176

>>674126

It is certainly "just an idea." There is empirical evidence for it, but no proof. Establish criteria

to test it, and prove the criteria in a controlled r observed test, and you get a Law. Any other

"theory" is just an idea, no matter how well accepted.

 

It takes only a single exception to disprove a theory. I am a big fan of science, which requires

an open mind. You are dangerously close to suggesting the opposite. I hope I am misreading

you.