Antifa loves Pedophiles

Just bring in the fleet of water cannons!

Seriously Facebook! Banned for 30 days for a post posted almost 3 yrs ago.

Either this is a result by a SEVERELY BUTT-HURT PSYCHOTIC, is Facebook that DESPERATE to censor conservatives or Trump supporters or some desperate PSYCHOTIC GROUP OF MUSLIMES?

Live-in Boyfriends aka "Unauthorized Occupants" In Public Subsidized Housing is Welfare Fraud And Rampant! It's Not Just Illegals In Public Housing Ripping Off The Tax Payers…

Among the most common forms of welfare fraud and the most abundant is "Unauthorized Occupants" in Public (taxpayer subsidized) Housing aka Live-in Boyfriends, Live-in Fathers not on the lease or approved to live in that unit. Women who collect assistance while failing to disclose that their boyfriend is living with them is welfare fraud, a crime. (Rules allow overnight visitors for no more than a handful of days each month.) It's taxpayers who are defrauded out of a couple hundred thousand dollars in large counties, each year. Our taxes can and in fact are increased to address thefts from these programs.

These are individuals who are receiving public benefits. There are rules and regulations that need to be followed in these programs, and when you're not following those rules, you shouldn't be entitled to receive those benefits. That's the bottom line, and it's a Federal crime.

According to Section 8 rules, a visitor CANNOT stay in your house for MORE than 14 consecutive nights without approval

Some of you may be thinking “Great, I’ll just have him/her stay out of my place once every 2 weeks and it will be all good.” WRONG!! The 2nd part of the rule states that a person CANNOT stay with you more than 21 nights total in any one year (12 month period, not calendar year). Some states may have slightly different rules, but a limit of the number of days/nights allowed. Most Public Subsidized Units do.

It is important to know that if you are allowing an authorized visitor to stay with you longer than allowed by Section 8 rules, you are committing FRAUD. This is because in your annual household application, which is a LEGAL document, you sign that the number of people staying with you is true and correct.

Why are Section 8 Rules So Strict?

You may be wondering what the big deal is if someone starts to live with you? What is the harm?

There are two reasons why the rules are so strict:

Housing Authorities try their best to protect residents and landlords, and to maintain drug and crime free housing. This is why, every member of your family has gone through a criminal background check, before HA approved them for Section 8. An unauthorized visitor has not gone through this criminal background check, so he/she may turn out to be a felon, sex offender, drug addict, etc. A HA would not consider this person safe and would not want them on premises.

HA calculates the reduced amount of rent you pay, based on the reported number of people in your household and your reported income. If someone is staying with you and helping you out with rent, this means you are actually stealing money from the government. This is because if this person would be officially included in your household, your rent would be higher!

To prevent criminals from living in Section 8 homes and to make sure Section 8 tenants aren’t subleasing out part of their home. All tenants receiving Section 8 vouchers must pass a Section 8 background check. Often unreported roommates have criminal backgrounds they want to hide. Also, if a tenant is getting government assistance on rent; they aren’t allowed to get extra rent or utility help from a roommate.

Suspicion of drug use, drug dealing, prostitution are also not allowed/fraud/crimes in it's self.

Unauthorized tenants In Public Housing (HUD) HUD Wins this common legal issue.(see attachment)

Rampant Welfare Fraud In Minnesota, Not just Child Care but in housing. 4 out of every 10 taxpayer funded rental units single head of households have live-in boyfriends sponging of the taxpayers. Even the Police & Sheriff's Offices know where to find the boyfriends with arrest warrants. And yes, these are in brand new taxpayer subsidized rental units with all the amenities.

Rampant Welfare Fraud In Minnesota Subsidized Housing, Not Just Day Care Fraud…under the Democrats!

DHS inspector general placed on leave after state audit finds fraud in Minnesota's child care program

Pervasive questionable payments found in Minnesota's child-care assistance program. By Chris Serres Star Tribune March 22, 2019

DHS Inspector General Carolyn Ham has left her position, less than a week after the state’s Legislative Auditor found pervasive fraud in the child-care assistance program and distrust within the agency.

The inspector general in charge of investigating fraud in Minnesota's health and welfare programs has been placed on investigative leave, less than a week after the legislative auditor found high levels of fraud in the state's child-care assistance program and "significant distrust" within the agency that administers it.

Carolyn Ham remains inspector general of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS), but the agency said she is "out of the office," as of Monday. A spokeswoman for the department declined to explain why Ham was put on leave or say for how long, citing data privacy concerns.

In a report last week, the Office of the Legislative Auditor said it couldn't specify the amount of fraud in the Child Care Assistance Program but said it is likely higher than the $5 million or $6 million that has been documented by county prosecutors who investigated a handful of child-care providers.

The report also cited a rift between Ham and the team of anti-fraud investigators within the agency. Most of the 14 investigators told the auditor's office that they had never met Ham, and several described her as unwilling to speak to them as they passed in the hallway, according to the report.

"This is an important first step in following up on the report," said Rep. Nick Zerwas, R-Elk River, who has been critical of the agency's leadership. Ham "clearly doesn't have the focus and the personality of the top job in the department to root out waste, fraud and abuse."

In a written statement, Ham said the allegations questioning her leadership are "completely without merit" and a distraction from state efforts to solve the problem of child-care fraud in Minnesota. "During my two years as inspector general, my top priority has always been to ensure that the taxpayers' money is being used in a responsible manner, and my record reflects that," she said. "This controversy has become a political distraction and I am eager for the truth to come to light."

Lawmakers called for the audit after a Fox 9 report last year alleged that as much as $100 million annually was lost to fraud — nearly half the program's entire budget — with money possibly diverted by child-care providers to terrorist groups in east Africa.

The legislative auditor found no evidence to substantiate those allegations but did find personal distrust and uncertainty about the role of the inspector general within DHS. The department created the position in 2011 to detect and prevent fraud in state programs that disburse hundreds of millions of dollars every year, but its mission and authority are still not defined in law, the auditor's report found.

Legislative Auditor James Nobles and Republican legislators have recommended that the Office of Inspector General be made a separate, independent office under state law. Nobles also recommended stronger internal controls for the child-care program, including electronic attendance records and other techniques for ensuring integrity.

In the 2018 fiscal year, the state paid $254 million in child-care subsidies for services provided to approximately 30,000 children from low-income families.

An independent consulting firm hired by DHS estimated that, since 2013, about 7 percent of payments were made to centers that used fraudulent billing practices, totaling $72 million over five years, according to the firm's report.

Ham, who has been inspector general since March 2017, has maintained a lower profile than her predecessor, Jerry Kerber, who was the first to hold the position. Kerber was widely credited with transforming the fraud and abuse division at DHS into a high-profile unit and testified frequently at the State Capitol, resulting in more staff and greater authority for the office.

http://www.startribune.com/dhs-inspector-general-placed-on-leave-after-state-audit-finds-fraud-in-minnesota-s-child-care-program/507322212/