>>6741308 lb

There is no flaw in my theory. I guess you missed the post where Q has explicitly said 'clowns' are here to try and discredit us. This is bigger than just the misguided Anjel. As for Ms. Rivers, her saying what she said doesn't make it fact. Makes it an unfounded accusation and she should have been smart enough to know insulting (((them))) publicly would bring retribution. And you yourself just admitted my whole premise,

> a widely held belief

Why is it now a widely held belief when just a year ago, it wasn't. And as you said, Ms Rivers died a few years ago, so why is it just in the last year become a popular belief? Because it started here. I never claimed it was unheard of prior to last year. I said the push on this board made it into public opinion.

Clowns will be clowns and they are in force.

>>6741502

Not Nunes. He was removed from the gang of 8 some that time because of false allegations from (((them)))

>>6741496

>I did a lot of research on this, past winter, but no interest.

Can probably thank Pelicanfag for that.

>>6741537

Or how about paying repairations for the white men who lost their lives freeing slaves from their Democratic owners.

>>6741524

I honestly don't remember.

>>6741563

110% agreed. Huge connections were missed with regards to Gulftainer and the Haiti trafficking network. It's likely those lines have now been cut but anons haven't made the connections. Agreed Q team has it all but connections anons make aren't going to be needed for trials.

IMO, this goes back 30 years to Slick Willy's time in office. Those networks were set up then. I just don't think enough info is public knowledge to make those final connections yet. I did some pretty extensive diggs on it last time Q brought it up. Sadly, that all went bye-bye when my hdd crashed.

>>6741602

I think when the "sky event" really does happen, there won't be any question.

>>6741570

Nunes wasn't part of gang of 8 during a critical time.

>>6741639

kek…sure would

>>6741661

Hope that Potus is finally seeing Wray for the snake in the grass he is. There won't be any reforming of FBI as long as Wray is Dir.

>>6741758

>BO if you have those depositions in archives

BO is not an archivist. That is up to anons to do the research themselves. Top of the bread has links to archives for your convenience.

>>6741784

MAGARiot shill trying to discredit. But I'm guessing you already know that.

>>6741808

>>6741767

This was predicted over a year ago when the "laptop" news first came out. That there is such a heavy push to discredit video's must mean it's going to come out "soon". 4%-6% will never believe anyway.

>>6741847

I know anon did finally get one sent in and it was responded to. Never saw the results. Was probably back in March.

>>6741824

Office of Special Counsel?

Is the Mueller's office?

>>6741834

"from engaging in some forms of political activity"

Are those certain forms defined anywhere?

>>6741897

Kerner also worked for Issa and Chaffetz. He's an R so guess Potus thought he wasn't too swampy. Or got bad advice yet again.

>>6741927

Understood. ThankQ for replying. Seems to split fine hairs when talking about free speech and opinions of a political opponent v engage in political activity.

>>6741962

>No name crony?

IDK. He worked for R's up on the Hill before Potus nominated him. Unknown swampy critter or simply bad advice given to Potus about him? Seems to me she whether this storm very early on in the Admin.

>>6742099

So why would Potus nominate him?

>>6742117

Ask her to make it retroactive so we can charge HRC and the DNC for doing it

>>6742157

Yes he did. Read the wiki bio. Potus nominated in May 2017.

>>6742162

>this is an epic setup

Yes it is and didn't it all start with that ABC interview last night? Those idiots thinking they were going to trap Potus into admitting something and just too stupid to follow what was/is going to happen next.