Anonymous ID: 976786 "WE went too deep." March 15, 2018, 11:19 a.m. No.674897   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4946 >>5102 >>5204

>>674404

 

Saturday 3.10.18

>>621887 rt >>621807 We went too deep.

 

>We went too deep.

>Attempted a pullback.

>Not ready.

>Q

 

The "We" at the start of this post puzzles me. Who is this We?

With that question I do not mean to ask who is this Q who today posts to us. Instead, I am asking what is the scope of the word "We" in this post.

 

OK, grant first that We includes today's Q, and might refer only to Q, the Q team, the extended team, +MI, +Potus, +current administration, … and/or others of today.

 

But what I am interested in is whether the We includes other as yet hinted but not specified people, groups, or even time-periods.

 

This post came in response to the mention of the book/movement of the early 20th c., "Natural Economic Order." And let's get this straight, Naturlich translates as Natural, NOT as National !!

 

During the early 20th a movement arose alongside the National Socialist (i.e. NAZI) movement with the Germanic acronym, NWO. Then, the NAZI usurped the NWO (or vice-versa) and the NWO movement sort of disappeared.

 

When Q writes, "Attempted a pullback. Not ready." is he referring to that original pre-NAZI NWO movement, suggesting it attempted to pull back from the entanglement with the NAZI?

And, then, Who is it that is not ready?

 

Is it the people of Germany, and by extension Europe, who are not ready to understand the NWO concept? Perhaps so.

 

Germany has a proud tradition of Idealism, apart from the craziness of the NAZI "Ideals". Yet, in the struggle against the horrible post WW1 sanctions that were destroying Germany, perhaps the people at that time were more emotionally swayed toward NAZI promise of a return to power, than they were toward the NWO promise of an economic system more ideally suited to the nature of humanity.

 

But the NAZI ideal had international conflict at heart while the NWO had international cooperation at its heart. The people were perhaps not capable of working through a Natural Economic Order for humanity while at the same time having their national economy systematically looted and crushed by the WW victors of the time.

 

So, is Q's "We" a reference to strictly today, or to something about today that contains roots in, or at least reference to, a Natural Economic Order, which we can fairly contrast to today's Hidden Economic Order (Oligarchic, Aristocratic, Pedocratic, or whatever it is!).

Anonymous ID: 976786 March 15, 2018, 11:48 a.m. No.675204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>674897

>>674946

 

>"Did we go too far into…?"

 

Not exactly the point. What I meant was, did we TRY to go toward a natural economic order, but the people were not ready (given the issues at the time), and the effort got hijacked.

 

Then did that "We" try to pull back from the Nat Soc appropriation? Because the pop at the time was not ready?

 

And, … fast forward to today … is now the time?