Anonymous ID: 92d9cb June 14, 2019, 10:16 p.m. No.6755300   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6755059 last

 

>>War is out, Truth is in. Anyone got it? The fascists have deleted it. I need to redpill someone, stat.

 

It was also called "The man who fought the bank".

 

All I could find was the original and not the 2.0 version. And stop calling them fascists, they are leftist Marxist commie bolshevik terrorists.

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ROh8bdQc7lu3/

 

No embed allowed sorry.

Anonymous ID: 92d9cb June 14, 2019, 10:42 p.m. No.6755458   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5469 >>5492

HOW EISENHOWER DESTROYED THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

 

Eisenhower's presidency had coincided with a long period of peace and prosperity. Indeed, the title of the popular 1970's TV show, Happy Days, refers to its setting in the 1950's. The Eisenhower years mark the peak years of 'the baby boom' and upward mobility of all classes and ethnic / racial groups. Apart from a minor and short-lived recession in 1958, the 50's truly were 'the good old days.'

 

One would therefore think that the Republican Party (aka GOP for Grand Old Party), with its popular and superficially likable 'war hero' presiding over these 'happy days,' would have greatly expanded, or at least maintained the Congressional majorities which Ike inherited upon winning the 1952 election in a massive landslide. This was not the case. To the contrary, in spite of two massive Eisenhower landslides, the 1950's turned out to be a history-altering bloodbath for House and Senate Republicans, and it was not by accident.

 

1952 & 1956: Eisenhower won two historic landslides and remained popular for the full eight years of his presidency. Meanwhile, conservative Republicans in Congress were picked off by the dozens. Why?

 

*

 

There were two elements driving this extremely odd paradox of such a popular president not having any election 'coat tails' for his fellow Republicans to grab onto. First, the Globalist media, while constantly exalting Eisenhower on one hand, trashed what was then a mostly conservative, anti-communist, constitutionalist Republican Congress with the other. But the real death blow of the one-two punch knockout of the GOP Congress came from Eisenhower himself.

 

During the 1954, 1956, 1958 and 1960 election seasons, Eisenhower โ€“ with the exception of a few liberal 'modern Republicans' โ€“ refused to lift a finger in defense of his beleaguered colleagues. He was the one man โ€“ the only man โ€“ in America who could have protected the patriotic anti-communist Republicans in Congress from the daily whipping they were taking from the Globalist press, but he refused.

 

Part one

Anonymous ID: 92d9cb June 14, 2019, 10:43 p.m. No.6755469   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5492

>>6755458

Robert Welch describes Ike's silent treachery of 1954, which only grew worse in subsequent Congressional elections, and peaked during the 1958 mid-term elections in which the GOP lost an additional 49 seats in the House, and 14 in the Senate. Welch:

 

'Nor can there be any slightest question about the disruption of, and damage to, the party being intentional. Eisenhower not only refused to do any campaigning for, or to give any White House moral support to, the Republican Senatorial and Congressional candidates โ€“ he left their campaigns permanently disorganized through his deliberate delaying tactics with regard to his expected support, which was never forthcoming. Then, at the very last minute, he went through face-saving motions, of which a high-school politician would have been ashamed, with his fantastically childish scheme of chain telephone calls.' (6)

 

'Delaying tactics,' eh? Just like the World War II delays which got so many Americans killed while preserving Eastern Europe for Stalin! The final paradoxical results of Eisenhower's sabotage were truly astonishing โ€“ all the more so when we consider how popular Ike had remained from start to finish of his 8 year reign of ruin. Here are the final "before and after" numbers:

 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

1952: 221 Republicans and 213 Democrats = R +8

 

1958: 153 Republicans and 283 Democrats = D +130

 

SENATE

 

1952: 49 Republicans and 47 Democrats = R +2

 

1958: 35 Republicans and 65 Democrats = D +30

 

The engineered loss of the Senate in 1954 was the event which โ€“ more so than the "censure" vote โ€“ killed the investigative hearings of the late great and falsely maligned Senator Joe McCarthy. Now a minority, the Republicans had to yield the chairmanship of the investigative committee to a Democrat, as the despicable Lyndon Baines Johnson became the Senate Majority Leader.

 

As shocking as the statistics are, there is more to the numbers than meets the eye. You see, many of the Senate and House Republicans who did manage to survive the Eisenhower purge were "modern Republicans" โ€“ today known as "RINO's" (Republican in Name Only). And most of the incoming Democrats who replaced them were of the extremist Marxist variety. Their dominance would shape the leftward course of America's political, economic and cultural decline for decades to come.

 

There can be no doubt that what happened to the GOP was an "inside job." Eight years of Ike forever killed the once conservative Republican Party, just as it had the conservative majority of the Supreme Courtโ€ฆ by design. No bloody wonder Democrat Sulzberger's New York Slimes (cough cough) and Democrat Meyer's Washington Compost (cough cough) endorsed Ike the "Republican" over Democrat Adlai Stevenson โ€“ twice.

 

The Democrat Party, which had been on the brink of destruction just six years earlier, knocked out the Republican Party in an epic rout. Yet 'Republican' Eisenhower always remained popular. The result pleased Eisenhower and Democrat Senate Leader Lyndon B. Johnson very much.