>>6756217

CIA disinfo at its prime.

I'm not going to argue about roundup treatment of grains before harvest. While I have not seen that here - our crops are mostly for cattle feed.

The disinfo?

"We all have to reject technology because we gon' die!"

Food production is the ultimate in terms of population control. Control who produces the food, control who gets the food, control who survives.

There is a truth in that the current farming practices are insufficient to provide for our level of consumption throughout the world. Not because of "the end of the farm" - but because consumption outstrips supply (somewhat… The way price fixing works is that farm conglomerates will let food rot rather than sell it for less than the federal compensation for 'lost crops'). More efficient uses of land exist, and have been rather slow to be adopted. Hydroponic systems and artificial lighting systems are more than capable of supplying our needs on a fraction of the land area and with far less requirement for chemical treatment and fewer concerns about runoff or other forms of contamination.

The farming methods pushed by many under this disinfo trap may not be bad ideas, per se, but they are completely impractical as a means of supporting the population densities we currently have. Which … Is the reason they are pushed.

There is another prong of this disinfo push. The CO2 "debate" is critical. All food crops aside from corn (maize) use the C3 photosynthetic cycle. Below CO2 concentrations of 100 ppm, C3 photosynthesis stops and plants die. Virtually all plant life is C3. Grasses are about all that survive in small concentrations of CO2.

In short - after a few hundred years of carbon sequestration, our planet looks something like Namek, or is probably closer to a global tundra or grassland. The only places where food could be grown would be in greenhouses with CO2 injection systems. The supply of carbon would then become a critical method of supplying food - control the carbon - control the population.

This would be a step beyond simple methods of making it hard to BUY food. You would be completely unable to grow it independent of a supply chain.

That is the long term plan. Part of it, at least.

>>6756278

Not the only one on our side.

The Green New Deal pre-AOC revolved around Carbon Credit systems to be "revenue neutral" - by having the Federal Reserve manage the carbon credit system and claiming that sale of carbon credits would pay for the GND, the public would have been sold on the idea that there was this Green deal that was 'just better' for the environment.

Guess who went in and, in her first term, gutted that shit straight out of the GND and grounded its cost in our tax dollars.

There is a reason they spend more protesting and advertising against her than the tax breaks they missed out on because she suggested that big business should get the same tax breaks as small business.

>>6756296

You people are stupid. Do you really think you can leak nonsense and turn our players against each other?

Haven't you heard?

Friendship is magic.

>>6756298

The cabal believes they know and tells people, amid the chaos they create, that they have answers to the unanswerable.

https://youtu.be/XqBVzc2D8Xc

Video related, believe it or not.

>>6756386

That whole idea never really made sense to me. Maybe you could exploit a vulnerability or if some part of the circuit was particularly well attuned to receiving some form of RF…. You could monkey with it.

But realistically, I would say it is far more likely that we are dealing with a compromise of our systems from Hillary and gang's love affair with China than voodoo microwave induction fuckery.

The Chinese build our damned boards and half our ICs… The IC one is a problem - you could insert backdoors or vulnerabilities by altering gate capacitance and some other advanced techniques.

Speaking of MH370… A whole engineering team from Fairchild Semiconductor went missing on that flight. If I had to guess, they were likely looking into whether or not their components were being lithed to spec. … My gut would tell me that they weren't.

>>6756463

Who did Don Jr. Call before the meeting with the Russian Lawyer?

This is a very important question.

Who hired PapaD?

Who gave PapaD an unusual position within the campaign?

This is also an important question.

Define patriot.

Now define country.

Why did Candidate Trump emphasize "small loan" that "was paid back, by the way?"

This isn't hard to figure out, anon.