>>6757633, >>6757791, >>6757711 CrowdStrike goes Public While Info hidden from DOJ
((>>6757711)) Why was this added as a notable when it is just made-up speculation?
((I can imagine this at trial. I imagine it would go something like this…..))
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Agent Smith, you testified that the Russians hacked the DNC computers, is that correct?
FBI AGENT JOHN SMITH: That is correct.
DEF ATT: Upon what information did you base your testimony?
AGENT: Information found in reports analyzing the breach of the computers……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
WTF Bakers? Why would this be a notable? I could understand speculation, but isn`t this a bit far?