Anonymous ID: a81d62 June 15, 2019, 12:50 p.m. No.6758729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8744 >>8795 >>8822 >>8851 >>8852 >>8904 >>8925 >>9069

NEED HELP WITH DIGGING

 

Crowdstrike went public just a few days ago (via Wall Street Journal)

 

“Shares in cybersecurity company CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. soared in their first day of trading Wednesday, closing up 71% from the IPO price and highlighting continued investor interest in fast-growing business-software firms. The results would value the company at roughly $11.6 billion if underwriters exercise all their options to purchase shares.”

 

It would be interesting to see who bought the offering, which could be the payoff to Crowdstrike for its crackerjack job for Hillary/DNC.

 

Probably not a good time to own CrowdStrike stock, since its brand is going to take a hit. Being a cybersecurity firm that specializes in racketeering and corrupt practices . . . well, I’m sure the FBI will investigate. /s

 

WHO BOUGHT THE OFFERING?

Anonymous ID: a81d62 June 15, 2019, 1:02 p.m. No.6758807   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8848 >>8859

Uranium 1 for NewAnons

 

  • Defendants in the four Uranium cases all came from sworn statements by David Gadren.

  • They were faked.

  • David Gadren is a ghost. He never existed.

  • Gadren never worked as a Special Agent for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Inspector General (OIG).

  • The affidavit he signed said he has been working there since 2008.

  • Court transcripts introduce Gadren as present at hearings.

  • He never says anything.

  • The Judge acknowledges Gadren as an attorney representing the prosecution.

  • Attorneys must report their legal license registration to the court.

  • None was ever reported for Gadren.

  • After one year on the job, Gadren was assigned one of the most important criminal cases in the history of the U.S.

  • Uranium One.

  • According to the job description of a DOE Special Agent, they investigate alleged wrongdoing of Department of Energy employees.

  • Gadren’s “Information” letter substituted as an FBI “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” against American and Russian citizens.

  • The FBI investigates wrongdoing of alleged crimes of its citizens.

  • The CIA authority is abroad in non-U.S. territories.

  • Gadren’s investigative authority comes from none of the these.

  • But the Judge it is okay because the defendants waived their right to a Grand Jury.

  • Gadren was substituted for the FBI.

  • The FBI never investigated the Uranium One case.

  • Out of three million documents, none of them have been validated as coming from an FBI investigation.

  • Two million documents have been sealed in the Uranium One cases. Who knows what happened to the rest.

  • The Judge is the same in all Uranium One cases.

  • Judge Theodore Chuang (schwong like King Kong) from the Federal District Court of Maryland.

  • President Barack Hussein Obama succeeded Chuang as Editor of the Harvard Law Review.

  • The prosecutor in all four cases were the same.

  • Rod Rosenstein, former Assistant Attorney General of the U.S.

  • Rosenstein was Attorney General for Maryland at the time charges were filed in the Uranium One cases.

  • Daren Condrey, one of the defendants, plead guilty on July 15th, 2015.

  • He has never spent a day in jail.

  • Rodney “Rod” Fisk was the key CEO in the case.

  • Fisk was reported dead in court transcripts.

  • No one knows him or has ever seen him.

  • No body was ever found.

  • No obituary.

  • No Memorial Service.

  • No recognition or award was ever given to him for negotiating a nuclear arms deal with Russia.

  • Fisk was said to be a diplomat from South Africa.

  • If true, why did the U.S. allow a South African diplomat to negotiate a nuclear treaty with Russia?

  • Where is a copy of the treaty?

  • All treaties have to be approved by the U.S. Senate.

  • Is “Rod Fisk” really Marc Rich?

  • Or Bob Rich?

  • Which Bob Rich?

  • Robert A. Rich, PhD, Harvard, a uranium geologist.

  • Mark Tutt Lambert’s trial is Oct. 29th. His is the last of four Uranium One cases.

  • Out of 17 witnesses for his defense, Lambert’s attorneys told the court on April 19th that only one will be called.

  • A five week trial has been whittled down to three days or less.

  • It has been delayed three times.

  • He too was never jailed. Bail was waived.

  • Lambert has been on probation for 20 years, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

  • His bankruptcy file is unavailable to public search.

  • None of the defendant’s attorneys in the Uranium One cases specialize in criminal law.

  • Yet they are approving guilty plea agreements for their clients.

  • Only Lambert has refused to cop a plea.

Anonymous ID: a81d62 June 15, 2019, 1:19 p.m. No.6758889   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anons should read the ICA.

 

The portion relevant to Stone, Crowdstrike, and the sloppy FBI acceptance of its redacted draft report that ‘Russia did it’ is on Scribd page 12 of 25.

 

It first asserts the GRU hacked the DNC server from 7/15 to 6/16. That is utter reliance on Crowdstrike and the word of the DNC. No way is that ‘high confidence’.

 

It then asserts Wikileaks got the DNC emails from GRU. There are two problems with this.

 

  1. Assange said is not true.

  2. Binney’s analysis of the Wikileaks released email metadata shows they could not have been hacked over the internet.

 

Both the high data transfer rate and the transfer protocol (blocks of data) are consistent with a thumbdrive which means an inside job, not a hack.

 

Moreover, Assange says his operative (I forget the name, but he was specific) picked up the data on a thumbdrive in Washington DC from a person in a named park at 2200.

 

Durham keying on this could help unravel the EC. Although I think the real key for Barr and team is not the erroneous ICA, but rather Halper and Mifsud and Downer in Europe ‘entangling’ Papadop from early April to June 2016.

 

Months before Crossfire Hurricane was opened late July 2016 based on the resulting ‘invented’ EC predicate.

Anonymous ID: a81d62 June 15, 2019, 1:24 p.m. No.6758916   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8936 >>9025 >>9060

WHY would Hillary owned DNC NOT ‘Trust’ the FBI to examine the servers or do a forensic examination?

 

Isn’t this the SAME FBI that Hillary OWNED; Director, Deputy Director and Counter intel Director, as well as obviously whole top echelon.

 

The SAME FBI that buried weiner laptop, Awan/DWS laptop, and exonerated Hillary on the emails?

 

WHAT could possibly have been on the DNC servers that was SO BAD they couldn’t let their buds at FBI see?

Anonymous ID: a81d62 June 15, 2019, 1:33 p.m. No.6758953   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8964 >>9069

NSA Whistleblower Bill Binney

 

Binney @13:15: “My understanding is the government is unable to give them an unredacted version because they don’t have one. That means that means they didn’t do the redactions.

 

That means the DNC and CrowdStrike did the redactions.