dChan
Anonymous ID: 96b179 June 16, 2019, 12:18 p.m. No.6765369   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5374 >>5491

Uranium 1 for NewAnons, happy digging

 

  • Defendants in the four Uranium cases all came from sworn statements by David Gadren.

  • They were faked.

  • David Gadren is a ghost. He never existed.

  • Gadren never worked as a Special Agent for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Inspector General (OIG).

  • The affidavit he signed said he has been working there since 2008.

  • Court transcripts introduce Gadren as present at hearings.

  • He never says anything.

  • The Judge acknowledges Gadren as an attorney representing the prosecution.

  • Attorneys must report their legal license registration to the court.

  • None was ever reported for Gadren.

  • After one year on the job, Gadren was assigned one of the most important criminal cases in the history of the U.S.

  • Uranium One.

  • According to the job description of a DOE Special Agent, they investigate alleged wrongdoing of Department of Energy employees.

  • Gadren’s “Information” letter substituted as an FBI “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” against American and Russian citizens.

  • The FBI investigates wrongdoing of alleged crimes of its citizens.

  • The CIA authority is abroad in non-U.S. territories.

  • Gadren’s investigative authority comes from none of the these.

  • But the Judge it is okay because the defendants waived their right to a Grand Jury.

  • Gadren was substituted for the FBI.

  • The FBI never investigated the Uranium One case.

  • Out of three million documents, none of them have been validated as coming from an FBI investigation.

  • Two million documents have been sealed in the Uranium One cases. Who knows what happened to the rest.

  • The Judge is the same in all Uranium One cases.

  • Judge Theodore Chuang (schwong like King Kong) from the Federal District Court of Maryland.

  • President Barack Hussein Obama succeeded Chuang as Editor of the Harvard Law Review.

  • The prosecutor in all four cases were the same.

  • Rod Rosenstein, former Assistant Attorney General of the U.S.

  • Rosenstein was Attorney General for Maryland at the time charges were filed in the Uranium One cases.

  • Daren Condrey, one of the defendants, plead guilty on July 15th, 2015.

  • He has never spent a day in jail.

  • Rodney “Rod” Fisk was the key CEO in the case.

  • Fisk was reported dead in court transcripts.

  • No one knows him or has ever seen him.

  • No body was ever found.

  • No obituary.

  • No Memorial Service.

  • No recognition or award was ever given to him for negotiating a nuclear arms deal with Russia.

  • Fisk was said to be a diplomat from South Africa.

  • If true, why did the U.S. allow a South African diplomat to negotiate a nuclear treaty with Russia?

  • Where is a copy of the treaty?

  • All treaties have to be approved by the U.S. Senate.

  • Is “Rod Fisk” really Marc Rich?

  • Or Bob Rich?

  • Which Bob Rich?

  • Robert A. Rich, PhD, Harvard, a uranium geologist.

Anonymous ID: 96b179 June 16, 2019, 12:40 p.m. No.6765515   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5533 >>5544

Barr's 'investigation of investigators' sparks fears for efforts to thwart Russia

 

  • (((John Sipher))), who served in the CIA’s National Clandestine Services for 28 years with a stint leading its Russia operations, said: “Trump with Barr’s help is trying to craft a narrative of a coup aimed at his campaign.” Sipher added: “The attorney general has shown a willingness to play ball with Trump. Barr has been willing to back up Trump.”

 

Sipher said Barr’s review was “hunting for scapegoats”.

 

Among the key figures Trump and allies have often attacked for their roles in the Russia investigation which they vilify as a “witch-hunt” are: former FBI director James Comey, ex-CIA director John Brennan, ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok and ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page. Some Trump aides and allies have called on these figures to be prosecuted.

 

  • (((Mary McCord))), a former top DoJ prosecutor who led the department’s national security division until spring 2017, said that launching a review into the genesis of the Russia investigation meant Barr was “allowing the president to have an open issue going into the 2020 elections that allows the whole witch-hunt” mantra to gain traction.

 

  • (((Mark Warner))), the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, said in a a statement he was worried Barr’s inquiry could impede counterintelligence efforts to thwart more Kremlin interference, which the FBI expects again in the 2020 election.

 

Warner said Barr’s review could have a “chilling effect on future counterintelligence investigations”.

 

  • Some DoJ veterans say concerns about Barr’s decision to launch his new review are misplaced, noting his deep legal background in government, including a stint as attorney general under George HW Bush .

 

“There is no way to know now what Barr will find in his investigation or whether or how he will use this power,” (((Jack Goldsmith))), a conservative ex-DoJ official and now a Harvard Law School professor, told the New York Times. “But Barr is not someone inclined to harm our national security bureaucracy.”

 

  • Other Barr testimony has raised fears he is taking political cues from Trump. At one Senate committee early last month, Barr was asked several times by Democratic senator (((Kamala Harris))) if Trump or anyone in the White House had suggested or pressured him to launch his broad review. Barr was evasive, but acknowledged there had been some “discussions” of the matter, adding that “they have not asked me to open an investigation”.

 

  • (((Ron Wyden))), a top Democrat on the Senate intelligence panel, is troubled by the direction that Barr’s review seems to be taking and the powers Trump has handed him.

 

“Trump has been searching for years for someone to selectively declassify intelligence and throw dirt on the Russia investigation,” Wyden said in a statement. Trump, he added, “wants any shred of misleading evidence that will validate his self-serving conspiracy theories. William Barr has embraced that role.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/16/william-barr-meller-report-investigation-2020-election

 

So many concerned fellow citizens

Anonymous ID: 96b179 June 16, 2019, 1:32 p.m. No.6765799   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5858

So this is how impeachment looks like in the streets?

 

https://dmlnews.com/breaking-anti-trump-activists-hold-rallies-across-us-to-call-for-impeachment-videos-pictures/

 

https://twitter.com/CREDOMobile/status/1139972091678208002