Recurring digits like that don't go UN-noticed on this board…No chance an anon would not make something of that occurring. If that is a tweet then it doesn't appear to be authentic either..the whole thing is suspect. imho
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.626722/gov.uscourts.casd.626722.1.0.pdf
https://www.trtworld.com/news/brenton-tarran
Who is Brenton Tarran? Gunman at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand
This article used Tarran in the Headline, however in the article details uses Tarrant..
DDG search all but one result is Tarran
The Shooter…was
Show us…been here long enough not to have seen that..sorry, not believable.
I call BS on this entire document, Personally have read many of these things..When is the last time something was crossed out a hand written by anyone as a means of a permanent record. Secondly Appendix is also hand written. The evidence used is also suspect..this was supposedly filed April 29.. and yet the evidence is furnished just 2 days before on April 27th. The shooting occurred on or about March 14th.
The posts used as evidence..do not look like what we would post here. This is complete BS!
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.626722/gov.uscourts.casd.626722.1.0.pdf
And your question is….
I'm calling bs on this: The YOUs notable..this
>> 6766064 This anon accurately points out the BS…The shooting occurred about March 14.. What is being used as evidence that 8 chan is the problem are dates that are over a month old from the shooting..as if it was on the day of the shooting being done live…Look at the dates they matter..This is nothing more than a set up from bad actors. The document is a Fake!
Indeed..I will do my best to lay this out correctly.
So in this series of posts what is dropped is a piece of a copy of this court listener doc..as an authentic warrant. Problem is it wasn't carefully examined with regard to the dates and the focus became the YOU's, the sauce wasn't provided until pushed for also. The reality is this, if that document had been provided at time of post the first obvious things that would have been noticed by autists and anons would have been the dates of the posts do not correlate to the event of the New Zealand Mosque shooter. This document is trying to infer that Qresearch is responsible for that shooting and that the events layed out in the document are of the shooting event live. Dates make this an entire fake.
>>6763791, >>6764176, >>6763811, >>6764208, >>6764284 anons on the (you)s in the /pol/ screencaps from 8Ch warrant
Sorry anon, not anything I can control, they came up automatically, trying to get something straight..if you follow the posts you will understand.
Best I can suggest is this…this was the sauce provided for those posts you read it 37 pages.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.626722/gov.uscourts.casd.626722.1.0.pdf