>>676693
Absolutely correct. The thomas paine interview made some generalizations that would lead people to think this was a simple problem and SES=Obama goon. If we brigade that idea too hard, we will look silly when they trot out all the legitimate program uses and ignore covering the abuse.
It is hard to find documentation about this program and that issue about whether or not they can be fired needs some textual support. Has anyone found relevant docs for this? If they can't be fired by the president or have authority that supersedes the political appointee head of agency, this is a massive massive problem.
The devil is always in the detail when it comes to government.