Anonymous ID: cc2cb4 March 15, 2018, 3:08 p.m. No.677248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7276

>>677109

My guess is that the US "doing something" about Iran will amount to withdrawing from the Iran deal and providing "support" to the Iranian people when the revolt gets serious against the mullahs. Already rumors that the Iranian military refused to crack down on the protests last year calling explicitly for regime change, and the mullahs had to resort solely to the Basij militias. Now there are reports that Basij militiamen are burning their Basij militia cards and siding with the people. If that is true, and large scale protests kick off again, with no military and no militia support, the mullahs are done. It will just be a matter of time. Gulf allies are building capabilities and forces. The important thing for the US will be international support, backing off the mullahs lackeys in neighboring countries and keeping Russia and China on the sidelines. NK already neutralized. SA's nuke announcement is part and parcel of neutralizing those in the EU community and others who are siding with the mullahs but would find a nuclear SA intolerable. Now Trump shuffles his deck to get Iran hardliners on board. Bolton, if that announcement is true, is a serious dude who is also a hardliner. He busted a lot of chops when he was Amb to the UN under GWB. Some don't like him because of his neocon heritage, but I don't think that would disqualify POTUS from using him. Time will tell.

Anonymous ID: cc2cb4 March 15, 2018, 3:31 p.m. No.677459   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>677325

He didn't even fill out that bracket. Probably dictated it. He can barely sign his name to it, if that's not a stamp. Only thing he's worried about is his next meal and his next nap.

Anonymous ID: cc2cb4 March 15, 2018, 3:37 p.m. No.677528   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>677364

Theory makes sense. Even if correct, every time a bridge is mentioned on TV, anons will post it here. Bridge? Bridge? Watch the water? Watch the water?

Anonymous ID: cc2cb4 March 15, 2018, 3:38 p.m. No.677550   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>677378

I don't believe any date theories spouted by anyone, not even Q. If he gives an exact date, I assume it's disinfo. Pros don't give out operational details in advance like that unless they are trying to influence or confuse their enemies.