>>6769073 (lb)
>shills can get baker to cuck on it
what a fucking sad state of affairs on a freedom of speech board.
don't worry faggots, i will never gib up on you
we fight the Good Fight.
carry on
o7
i'm not dividing anyone.
i love all walks of life, except for the ones who try to destroy it.
just pointing out the fact you want to stifle free speech.
which, it so happens, is an odd behavior.
>deflection to the 'masons' wont work
don't forget, Q chose this place for a reason…. can you take a guess what that reason was?
>learn to code because you suck at this job
>well your the weaker for a reason.
what the fuck is this?
i'm weaker for being a tolerant, well-rounded person who loves mankind and who happens to cherish the idea of Freedom of Speech?
if you have a well-reasoned argument, state it.
otherwise shut the fuck up and lurk.
bible quotes mean nothing in this context.
lol i'm not angel you retard
kek
btw, i love my POTUS
>anjel
>nope
whats funny is that you are trying so hard to blend in and be anon that you expose yourself.
all one has to do is look at your post history for the bread to see what angle you are pushing.
it's very subtle
and very clever.
but we see you.
all. day. long.
no hate here, just searching for truth as any anon would.
those who stand in the way of that search for truth are suspect.
>suspect.you.png
you sit there and act like you to try to spend as much time here to monitor the board so it's less 'shilly' and … dare i say, 'hatefu'l?
>thanks blart
who the fuck are you to think you can do that here?
>igetitthough.mpeg
you are well funded.
mostly from US tax dollars, which is sad.
we've been convinced to pay for our own poison, haven't we?
my reading comprehension is fine. please state your argument.
>If you get to the part about women and it still applies slooooow way down IQ 75
if you're talking about gender, tell me how that applies to your above argument (when you decide to make it)