Anonymous ID: 59793d June 17, 2019, 4:09 a.m. No.6770124   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0130 >>0133

''Do we know for sure that Crowdstrike made the redactions in their draft report?==

 

One of these couldve easily made the redactions…

 

DNC

HRC Campaign

Perkins Coie

 

If I remember correctly the report did not go directly from Crowdstrike to the FBI, it passed thru one of the others

Anonymous ID: 59793d June 17, 2019, 4:12 a.m. No.6770133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6770124

 

It is worth noting that CrowdStrike and Alperovitch’s story has evolved over time to match a Democrat narrative. In an article in Inc. on June 14, 2016, titled “Why the DNC Hired This Cybersecurity Firm to Fight Russian Spies,” Alperovitch claimed that the purpose of the DNC hack was to expose Donald Trump:

 

“Every world leader is trying to figure out who Mr. Trump is, especially if he’s elected president, and they want to know what his foreign policies would be. Russia is no exception,” says Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike. His firm was hired to manage the breach. “The actors are also interested in any other information the DNC might have in their opposition research to use it against Trump if he becomes president,” says Alperovitch, who leads the Intelligence, Technology and CrowdStrike Labs teams.

 

There is no justification for a technical expert like Alperovitch ascribing motives to the hackers or making statements about what “world leaders” think. It is simply outside his area of expertise, but the point of the Democrats using Alperovitch and Henry to promote their “Russian hacking” narrative is to provide a technical veneer to their story to score political points.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/03/09/house-committee-russian-hacking-includes-only-dnc-hired-tech-experts/