>Let's say he doesn't support 5G and GMO to kill us all, but out of a desperate need to get some real economic growth going.
You're going to need to sauce the claims that either of these things are going to "kill us all."
>Let's say he doesn't support 5G and GMO to kill us all, but out of a desperate need to get some real economic growth going.
You're going to need to sauce the claims that either of these things are going to "kill us all."
<Let's say he doesn't support 5G and GMO to kill us all, but out of a desperate need to get some real economic growth going.
>You're going to need to sauce the claims that either of these things are going to "kill us all."
>This. Please. So sick of this unfounded talking point.
Yet it gets pushed so hard around here. It's almost like someone had an agendaโฆ
Full moon.
Anons, use your discernment on posts like this. This is a tactic. Most of the things in here get you going, "yeah, yeah!" and you keep reading wanting to agree with all of it.
Then there's some little claim, couched in double negatives, in this case "[Trump supports] 5G and GMO to kill us allโฆout of a desperate need to get some real economic growth going."
Are you still, "yeah, yeah"ing at that line? Or did a red alert go off in your head?
I'm not going to quibble with baker's decision to add it to notables. I think it's a great way to expose a textbook disinfo PSY-OP.
Baker Notable