>>6770667

Communists and Socialists believe that the good of the 'whole' is more importnat than the good of the few.

that is a belief in human sacrifice.

It is well known that they send their true believers off to die while the children of the powerful are 'in the band' and not put into harms way.

It is well known that aggitate and do poison mentoring and cause problems and breed disfunction.

It is well known that they set up a hunger games situation and let people fight amoung themselves, and provide no sane council to stop the violence, but blame it instead on political rivals.

They sacrifice the young of the 'lower classes' in endless wars againt their relatives who run the other nations.

projection? stupidity? or insight that you don't have, still believing tht the people who brainwashed you to believe the socialist nonsense are your friends?

They litterally will eat you if they get too hungry.

And PS: they are not realy atheists, they worship the opposite and they worship their own power.

>>6770696

It's not the black fathers, it's the mothers.

who aren't black.

It's the cabal mothers who are connected and they have 'black' children who are thus cabal and then they put those people in charge of everything and suck up all the positions and affirmative action on some small midocondriallly special cabal children.

It's 'black' children with cabal mothers who are 'the problem' if there is a problem.

heavy shilling: saying not to pray

attacking Fathers

what else?

>>6770704

not "sabotage the growth" but remove the parasites so that China can be what China is supposed to be: awesome.

Spread the wealth to the Chinese people.

China is a slave to the cabal as it is.

We don't kill the slaves, we free the slaves!

>>6770719

shills?

article about 'black fathers' was referenced by an anon and I wrote a stupid counter piece to give an alternative, and probably rather bullshit narrative of my own.

and then there is the one who keeps reponding to me, from last bread where he went on about how he's fine without praying and finally told me to fuck myself, I think.

And so I'm sitting here recognizing my own crazy in responding to those who only have intent to harm, and presenting quasi-fictional counternarratives that are almost close to factual, but still too contriversal to say, even here, that most of the 'dreamer' children have mothers who . . . are connected to the cabal. They are either the maid-families or the children of cabal rulers from the other place.

Like the bird that puts it's egg in some other bird's nest, these cabal ruling class people put their loyal slaves here and let the largesse of the US raise them.

Listen: in 'liberal' states you get a free education if you say you are a 'dreamer'. That used to be called descrimination. They have perverted affirmative action to allow for their slave children to be always at the front of the class.

and the kid who is born in Holyoake? Whose mom is a crack whore? Whatz that one get?

so I give out my quasi-fictional soft-revealish narratives hoping full well that I could be proven full-of shit about my view of this. It was clear to me when that 'class' the dreamers, was put on a pedestal, that we were a subject, and vassel, nation of . . . someone. I assumed it was World Socialist. I still feel that is mostly what it is.

But is there a higher level, this 'cabal', as it is called?

I ask the question and 'kind of' know.

The socialists, too, are cucks, and enslaved, adn must, as well, be freed.

end of quasi-fictional bogus narrative that is just as false as the shill's who attack me for just being a whimsical off the cuff guy who says things like

PRAISE THE LORD in capital letters just to piss off the atheists.

does that make me fake?

>>6770769

>>6770758

as far as book sales go: how do you know that any book is ever delivered?

does anyone ever audit how many books actually get printed?

if it could be proven that the numbers are bogus and that the books were never, in fact, printed, then would that constitute a fraud?

how does one audit or monitor such a process?

is the whole 'sale of books' just elaborate money laundering outside the law?

could the FEC get involved? The IRS?

The US Marine JAG?

I'm for an audit of all political book sales going back 50 years.

Didn't someone say there was an aniversary of the Army? Army has a finance corp? they can do audits too.

>>6770702

I really don't care what you are.

my narrative is a throw away.

I'm not invested in trying to hurt you like you seem to be trying to slander me.

you don't believe in anything real?

you won't say what you are just because you are a knee jerk skeptic?

I don't care.

I'm not just talking to you, but with those who actually have ears and can hear.

they might learn a thing or two.

But you just want to call me a shit or whatever.

so that's your thing, a dominance thing.

but the 'dominance and submissive' game is a sad one because no one who is worthy of being in control would ever want to be in control of another. So the Dominant in the dominance and submission game is really always a submissive.

they always heal to the bigger person.

whaever you are you are a name caller, at least.

but so what, I've been called worse.

I'm glad you aren't a socialist.

I understand, I am a refugee from socialist 'frenz' who demanded I adhere to their talking points.

they could never fathom an real discussion of God.

they wouldn't even let me talk about it.

So how did you escape from them? so angry at me when I'm just like a tourist in your life, I'm nobody to you. just someone who will constantly and repetivily entreat all believers to

PRAISE THE LORD

but that's an insult to you ?

you'll equate me to an outhouse full of exrment that tell falsehoods?

I'll be a total and complete bog filled with spetic and poison ideas?

wow that is far fetched. I am not that.

neither is anyone.

not you, not any one.

give up your anger, at least.

>>6770919

That is one powerful meme!

is it a slide to assume that she's a high priestess?

you all know who

so the assumption of some here is that she is a high priestess and thus her successor is already known? or will be chosen?

when a pope dies they have a conclave.

so where is the coven meeting these days?

did they already decide or . . . do we find out.

also: is she really?

>>6771021

some people are polyloqucious and blabber a lot.

that would be me.

my mind is faster than I type.

>>6770950

>5200ed

your not into dominance but you will WHAT?

OK.

I get it.

Love and kisses to you too.

>>6771225

I think you are confusing them with The Aztecs.

Mayans were not known as cannibals.

you will need sauce for that.

Aztecs were probably Cabal Mongols who invaded from the north bringing Canibalism with them.

Canibalism is rare in America.

>>6771301

Given that Q drops were about her, of course her passing is notable.

and given Cooper's stature as cabal spokes-mouth.

>>6771313

I think you need to sauce the reverse.

There was a notable article about it in a scientific journal concerning why Pueblo cultures went up to the cliffs, that invaders were canibals.

the only other instance that I recall is about Witigo, or Witiko of the Cree, and that was only during times of great famine (in the Great White North). And they have a mythology of a creature who 'possesses' those starving. It's rather elaborate.

Papers for that are in Philadelpha from original letters (I can't site them off the top of my head) but they are in an archive down near Independance Hall.

other two instances that I know are: the Donner Party.

The Aztec nobility (The Aztecs were a ruling class) were cannibals.

the whole thing in the Andes with the air plane crash.

that's all I got for Cannibals. If you have more then please provide them.

>>6771350

I've studied at great length about MezoAmerican and North America native societies.

Aztecs were creepy ruling class invaders.

they knew that they were sinful in what they did. They played a psychological operation on Montezumma and he folded like a cheap suit and then they made him pay for his crimes. That would be the mayans in leauge with the Spanish, and then they set up Mexico and purged away the cannibals because Mayans were as abohorent to it as most humans are.

so that's the story I give.

you have a different one that insults 100's of millions by claiming that their ancestor were something that they were not.

It's up to you to sauce the evidence that the Mayans were that way. You will find none.

>>6771351

>5200ed

have him say 'voila'

he could say 'is it 'voila? or is it 'whalla' and pronouce it in two different ways . . .

that would surly tell the story to us here.