South Africa: Black Rapes Farmer’s Wife in Front of Her Kids, Molests Daughter, Threatens to Kill Son

A South African mother was put through a ‘living nightmare’ by a rapist who held a gun to her children’s head to force her into sex.

Nicky, 45, was raped in front of her children by 32-year-old Sebenzile Simane – who also sexually molested his victim’s daughter after shooting his way into the farm house.

Simane, who also tied the family up and stole their money, was handed two life sentences and a total of 173 years in prison after he was found guilty of the string of violent crimes in South Africa’s Eastern Cape.

Nicky and her husband Heine, a 44-year-old farmer, who are choosing to tell their story, have been forced out of their farm house and say that farmers in the country face an ongoing threat of violence.

Describing her ordeal, Nicky revealed how:

Her attacker shot her in the bottom as she shielded her children from his bullets. Simane threatened to ‘shoot off’ her 15-year-old son’s feet unless he raped his mother. The gunman laid Nicky’s daughter down beside her and undressed her and tried to rape her. He only agreed not to rape the 13-year-old girl if she watched him rape her mother instead. Simane raped the mother twice and only spared her a third rape as she had lost too much blood to have sex.

The white-washed £1.3million farmhouse – set in nearly 1,000 acres of land – had belonged to the family for a century and Nicky’s two sons, aged nine and 15, and her 13-year-old daughter had been brought up there.

The family home was so remote that their nearest neighbour was a mile away and did not hear the gunshots at the home.

After surviving the horrific ordeal the family is now planning to move to Australia to set up a new farm there.

Describing what happened on March 23, 2018, Nicky said a stream of bullets came blasting through the patio door, narrowly missing her 15-year-old son’s head.

Nicky said: ‘With the bullets smashing through the windows I can only describe our feeling as being hunted like wild animals.

He shot his way through a sliding patio door to get in. ‘What followed I can only describe as four hours of pure hell – just sick torture and depravity,’ Nicky said.

‘He held the gun to my nine-year-old son’s head and threatened to shoot him unless I complied. ‘I told my little one to be quiet or else this man would kill us. All I saw were his silent tears rolling down his little cheeks for the next four hours. The sight of that will be with me forever. ‘He tied us all up with fencing wire so tight that our hands lost their circulation and turned grey. ‘He shouted at my children that he was there to kill their father and that he would chop him up in front of them. He said that when he came through the door they would watch him butchered. ‘He then repeatedly threatened to shoot my eldest son’s feet off if he didn’t obey him and then ordered him to rape me. I had never heard such a sick thing before and was totally mortified. ‘All I could do was beg him not to make my son do that. He just kept pointing the gun at my son’s feet and saying he would shoot them unless he raped his mum in front of his brother and sister. ‘I begged and pleaded with him not to do this and to take me to another room and take me instead.’ Explaining what happened next, she said: ‘He grabbed me and forced me to my bedroom and raped me there. There was blood everywhere as I had already been badly shot. I could do nothing as my hands were tied behind my back. ‘He then brought my 13-year-old daughter to the bedroom, undressed her and attempted to rape her. He was sexually molesting her and all I could do was beg for mercy and to take me again. ‘So instead of raping her he forced my beautiful innocent daughter to watch as he raped me again. ‘I cannot describe the anger this man displayed toward us and I knew as he raped me that if my children had any chance of survival I had to get this man away from them and the farm house. ‘You don’t care about yourself – you just don’t want your children to die and you do all you can.’

1

>>6773002

Describing how she finally shook the man off, she said: ‘He had tried to start our car outside but couldn’t get it going so in a bid to buy my family time I told him to take my bank cards and pin numbers and to let me drive him to town to the ATM.

‘He tied up my children even tighter even though their hands were already grey from no circulation. ‘I drove into town and got him my maximum 4,000 rand [£225] which was just before midnight so he told me to drive to a quiet spot until after midnight when the ATM would allow him to use the card again. ‘He undid my seat belt and told me to recline the seat so he could rape me again but I was so weak from the loss of blood I told him that if he raped again I would almost certainly bleed to death. ‘I told him it was 12.04am and that the ATM would give him another 4,000 rand and to please just take my cards and take his money and let me drive to hospital where I could get help. ‘Once he was out of our VW transporter I hit the accelerator and drove back to the farm and found the children had freed themselves and called a neighbour and that help had reached them. ‘I hugged my brave and petrified children but despite what had happened to us all and the emotional and physical torture he had put us through we were all alive and that was the important thing, ‘For us as parents the saddest part of this is that we can never give our children their innocence back. That creature took it. The children and I will never be able to live on that farm again.’

2

>>6773009

>>6773002

>>Poor family. At least they learned about the nature of…

Nicky said: ‘My family and I had no choice in what happened to us that night, we do however have the choice not to let it define us, we choose to live and will be eternally grateful to have survived that night.

‘It could have been so different and we have our demons but are just trying to rebuild but we will not let that creature destroy us and it will take time but we will move on and lead good lives.

‘Lastly, I would appeal to each and every South African to remember the words of Nelson Mandela: ‘We can change the world and make it a better place. It is in your hands to make a difference’.

>>No, wait. They didn’t.

>>6773028

I believe because of our (((immigration))) system they have trouble entering Western countries. I agree with you on settling on Brown lands. You will eventually lose it. Look at America. We are on our way. Diversity doesn't and can't work ever. Especially when you have Jews enflaming the problem.

>>6773034 >>6773047 >>6773029 >>6773009 >>6773029 >>6773028

South Africa: Jews Flee the Country They Helped Destroy

Jews were heavily involved in the movement to bring an end to white rule in South Africa. Hear it from the Jews themselves.

Tablet Mag:

In 1963, after South African police arrested six Jews and seven blacks in a raid on an African National Congress hideout in the Johannesburg suburb of Rivonia—a sweep that eventually landed Nelson Mandela in prison for more than 25 years—a white nationalist newspaper asked whether Jews were unhappy in South Africa. The community’s Board of Deputies responded unequivocally that the opposite was true, promising that South Africa’s Jews were loyal and patriotic. “No part of the community can or should be asked to accept responsibility” for the actions of a few, the board insisted in its official reply.

In time, of course, Mandela became a hero, and the actions of those few became a point of pride for South African Jews. Beginning with his years at Johannesburg’s more or less integrated University of the Witwatersrand—aka “Wits”—and later as an apprentice to a Jewish law firm, Nelson Mandela had a political life that was profoundly intertwined with those of Jewish activists who, to varying degrees, found in their Jewish identity the imperative to object to a system that, while almost completely welcoming to them, treated blacks in a way that many of these children of European refugees found discomfitingly familiar.

While most South Africa Jews took the silent, implicitly conservative position of the Board of Deputies, the great majority of white South Africans involved in “the struggle” were Jewish. Many were Communists. Most were lawyers. A few had money. But all faced what has been described as a “double marginality”: not fully accepted as white, while also alienated from an organized Jewish community beholden to the powers that be.

That so many Jews surrendered the comforts of their own relatively privileged lives—indeed, in at least one case, surrendered life itself—to join Mandela and the ANC, though they had little material stake relative to their black comrades, is in itself a testament to the radical legacy these Jews brought with them out of Europe to the other end of the globe.

But now that the Jews have achieved their objective, and the country has been ruined with black rule, it seems they don’t want to stick around to enjoy the new “Rainbow Nation.”

>>6773073

South Africa: Jews Flee the Country They Helped Destroy

Haaretz:

If South African Jews feel compelled to uproot themselves, Jewish community leaders console themselves in the fact that many are going to Israel. “For us, that’s a positive thing,” says Wendy Kahn, national director of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies.

Geoff Cohen, the educational director of Herzlia, the leading Jewish day school in Cape Town, says his students are sent off with the following message: “If you’re not going to stay home, then go home.”

And that is what Jewish lawmaker Michael Bagraim is advising his own children. “I go to lots of Shabbat dinner tables, so I know what people are talking about,” says the Democratic Alliance MP — one of four Jews to serve in the current parliament. “They are extremely worried. Everyone is encouraging their children to leave. I’m encouraging mine as well. And yet I’m a proud South African. I don’t want to leave ever. But I know that if I have to run — and I’ve always got a bag packed — I’ll run to Israel.”

Of interest, first of all, is that 4 out of the 400 MPs in South Africa are Jews, 1% of the total. The population of South Africa overall is 57 million. The Jewish population is 50,000, less than 0.1%. So Jews are overrepresented in the South African Parliament by a factor of more than 10. Secondly, these Jews, who debate and decide the country’s future, nonetheless have no deep-rooted commitment to it. They advise their children to leave and keep a suitcase permanently packed, ready to jump on a plane at a moment’s notice. Will this outlook not affect the deliberations they make? Of course it will. And this is true for elected Jewish representatives around the world. To them, a country is just a hotel. Except one, of course.

Think how many back-to-the-wall moments throughout history there have been – Greeks versus Persians, for example – where the absolute, unshakable commitment of a people to defend its own land made a difference to the outcome. If you have Jews in your deliberative body, that commitment just isn’t going to be there.

The same pernicious pattern we see in South Africa recurs throughout history. Jews enter a country, consolidate their power in it, then begin pursuing some process of destructive change, calling it Tikkun Olam (“Healing the world”). Anyone who opposes the destructive change or points out the Jewish role in it is accused of “antisemitism.” In the end, the destructive change is achieved and the country is healed ruined. Jews may enjoy some temporary privileged status as a result of riding so high on the wave of destruction. But soon their privilege is resented, the fact that the country is now ruined comes to general notice and affects the Jews themselves, and, of course, the role the Jews played in bringing that ruin about cannot fail to be perceived. Time to grab that suitcase and move on. Find a new host. Pattern repeats. (And once they’ve found their new host, the Jews will write books vilifying the people in the country they just left, accusing them of antisemitism for having attempted to forestall the ruin the Jews were intent on bringing upon them.)

Why do Jews do it? Can’t they stop themselves? It’s not good for them; it’s not good for the goyim. But even when they enjoy comfortable and privileged lives, they somehow feel impelled to act as an entropic force, dissolving the structural bonds of whatever society they live in.

For too many Jews, the tragic truth is: No, they can’t help it. It’s their nature. It reminds me of the parable of the Scorpion and the Fox, memorably told by Chakotay in the Star Trek: Voyager episode “Scorpion,” as the humans debated whether they could have a mutually beneficial relationship with the Borg.

Where will the Jews go, after they have ruined the West? Will the Chinks let them in?

>>6773074

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7147287/South-African-mother-45-raped-children.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/jewish-organizations-had-a-role-in-1965-act-1523374146?shareToken=st865514f3f7364f72b58af8a53dd9e481&reflink=article_email_share

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/04/11/letter-to-the-wall-street-journal-re-jewish-involvement-in-immigration-policy/

That's just a small tip of the Jewish immigration iceberg.

>>6773111

(((Immigration)))

The intellectual movements of Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore the most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

Celebrating Diversity

One of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.

Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant scrutiny in nations with well-defined national identities. It is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

In a remarkable admission from Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society’s homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.

Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? “I’d rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention.” This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.

>>6773214

>>6773209

He looks like a fake person in a media hoax. That's what he looks like.

>>6773171

>>I find it easier to start by introducing people to propaganda.

>>Easier to point out that TV news is a bunch of hysterics, then talk about who pays for it.

That is merely the "what is happening". It's not just "news" but the entirety of media and entertainment as a perception management and influence operation.

Once someone gets "what is happening" then when they ask "why it is happening" or "who is doing it" you can share them that information (pics).

>>6773261

Arkansas: Woman Who Introduced Anti-Tranny Bathroom Bill Found Dead, Female Acquaintance Arrested

In 2017, she introduced a controversial transgender “bathroom bill” to the Arkansas Senate that would have required people to use the bathrooms that correspond to their assigned sex.

That little fact is just dropped in there at the end of the article.

You may remember that this was a very big deal at the time.

NBC News, March 16, 2017:

“No child should have to worry that their school might change its policy to force them to shower or undress in front of a member of the opposite sex as has been the case around the country,” Republican Sen. Linda Collins-Smith, who introduced the legislation, said in a statement.

Collins-Smith switched from being a Democrat to being a Republican, presumably over the homosexual issue. And she was the focus of worldwide media attention during the tranny bathroom crisis of 2017.

So her getting murdered is kind of a very suspicious event, which should be analyzed.

But no.

Don’t expect there to be any analysis.

They will just say this woman was angry or insane or whatever. Then that will be that.

>>6773193

Celebrating Diversity

One of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.

Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant scrutiny in nations with well-defined national identities. It is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

In a remarkable admission from Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society’s homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.

Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? “I’d rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention.” This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.

Trump Claims We Can Fight Fake News on Social Media While Big Tech Continues Banning His Supporters

Trump is actually claiming that we can fight fake news on social media. It’s hard not to laugh at how stupid this statement is.

Trump might still have his Twitter account, but most of his prominent supporters have already been banned off of the big social media sites. If they haven’t been banned, they’re being demonetized or censored in some underhanded fashion. The digital army that helped Trump get elected in 2016 is being systematically silenced in the lead up to the 2020 election.

Trump has also demoralized his supporters by refusing to take any action on this issue. Instead of ordering the Federal Communications Commission to start regulating these companies, all he has done is tweet about how they shouldn’t censor “conservatives.”

The bottom line is that you can’t fight fake news on social media if you’ve been banned from social media. We’ve seen countless examples of the ban hammer being dropped on all sorts of right-wing groups and personalities. We are at a point where a cuckservative comedian like Steven Crowder is getting demonetized on YouTube.

But it’s even worse than that now.

Project Veritas recently interviewed a whistleblower from the social media company Pinterest who provided documented proof of their diabolical censorship agenda. He exposed how they put a pro-life website on a porn block list, censored Bible verses and blocked all sorts of other right-wing material.

After breaking this story, Project Veritas had their Twitter account suspended, and their original report about Pinterest’s censorship program was erased off of YouTube.

Pinterest quickly discovered who the whistleblower was and fired him, which prompted the whistleblower to go public. The whistleblower identified himself as Eric Cochran, an engineer who worked for Pinterest. Tucker Carlson interviewed him on his show this past evening and described some of the chicanery that Pinterest involved itself in.

So long story short, we are now at a point where we have hard proof that these tech companies are going so far as to censor pro-life and anti-abortion content. This is obviously insane, but we’ve been saying for the past few years that this type of thing was going to happen. Unfortunately, few people listened to us because they naively thought that they’d be safe if they avoided talking about Jews and racial issues. Those people were wrong to think that and we are now at a point where even anti-abortion content is subject to big tech censorship.

That’s why it is so absurd to see Trump sending out tweets saying that we can fight fake news on social media. This is just not possible when these tech companies are allowed to ban whoever they want for any arbitrary reason and not face consequences.

If Trump does not regulate these companies and require them to provide free speech, they are going to ban most if not all of his political supporters by the 2020 election. By that time, the only person fighting fake news will be Trump himself. But that’s operating under the assumption that they don’t just go ahead and ban his social media accounts as well. And why wouldn’t they go that far? It’s not like anybody would actually stop them if they decided to go ahead and do that.

What this conclusively shows is that there is no such thing as free speech in America. Trump is just letting these big tech companies trample over the First Amendment.

Trump tweets:

The Fake News has never been more dishonest than it is today. Thank goodness we can fight back on Social Media. Their new weapon of choice is Fake Polling, sometimes referred to as Suppression Polls (they suppress the numbers). Had it in 2016, but this is worse…..The Fake (Corrupt) News Media said they had a leak into polling done by my campaign which, by the way and despite the phony and never ending Witch Hunt, are the best numbers WE have ever had. They reported Fake numbers that they made up & don’t even exist. WE WILL WIN AGAIN!

>>6773467

The chinks might not take them but they do have those "ghost cities". We know how much Jews love the tenement lifestyle.

>>6773507

Bullshit.

Jones didn't claim it was a hoax until it was proven a hoax by others. It was only once that happened that he tarnished it by sticking his fat head into the issue. He did what he always does, he peddled misinfo and disinfo the entire way. Those that don't depend on him for information can figure things out for themselves.

>>6773581

Truth would put people in the hospital

>>6773639

I'm saying it was a staged event aka a "hoax" perpetuated by the media. We knew it after a month while Jones was still stringing people along about "second" shooters and other dumb bullshit. Specifically denegrating people that said nobody died. What are you stupid? You don't even comprehend what I'm saying about him dummy.

>>6773669

>>Dems are the real racists

>>6773687

They used pictures of seven year olds as "victims".

Then the kids grown up at 12 or so sang at the Ravens/49ers super bowl.

Maybe you will "believe" that when you see it. YouTube probably banned it though.

Stupid asshole